<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Quantitative Analysis is not Trivial &#8212; The Case of PB-ROE</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2007/07/06/quantitative-analysis-is-not-trivial-the-case-of-pb-roe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/06/quantitative-analysis-is-not-trivial-the-case-of-pb-roe/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/06/quantitative-analysis-is-not-trivial-the-case-of-pb-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-1643</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 07:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=165#comment-1643</guid> <description>OK, your math is right as far as it goes.  So long as the intercept of the regression equation is near zero, PB-ROE and low P/E investing are similar.  There are times in the market when book value is prized, and times when earnings growth is prized.  In both cases, the intercept will not be zero.
Paul, thanks.
BriG, thanks also.  He may have been trying to give a stylized example.  Ed Spehar&#039;s note had more data behind it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, your math is right as far as it goes.  So long as the intercept of the regression equation is near zero, PB-ROE and low P/E investing are similar.  There are times in the market when book value is prized, and times when earnings growth is prized.  In both cases, the intercept will not be zero.</p><p>Paul, thanks.</p><p>BriG, thanks also.  He may have been trying to give a stylized example.  Ed Spehar&#8217;s note had more data behind it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OK</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/06/quantitative-analysis-is-not-trivial-the-case-of-pb-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link> <dc:creator>OK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 07:08:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=165#comment-1642</guid> <description>(P/B)/(E/B)=P/E? No?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(P/B)/(E/B)=P/E? No?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BriG</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/06/quantitative-analysis-is-not-trivial-the-case-of-pb-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-1638</link> <dc:creator>BriG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 03:10:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=165#comment-1638</guid> <description>Ok I took a second look and figured out the discrepancy. Mr. Maxfield  rigged his example by using the same book value for all 3 companies. When it comes to linear regression 2by3 isn’t the same as 4by6, or 6by9.
He was trying to claim from a purely mathematical standpoint that they were the exactly the same(PB-ROE vs P/E), but clearly that’s false.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I took a second look and figured out the discrepancy. Mr. Maxfield  rigged his example by using the same book value for all 3 companies. When it comes to linear regression 2by3 isn’t the same as 4by6, or 6by9.</p><p>He was trying to claim from a purely mathematical standpoint that they were the exactly the same(PB-ROE vs P/E), but clearly that’s false.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PaulinKansasCity</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/06/quantitative-analysis-is-not-trivial-the-case-of-pb-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-1635</link> <dc:creator>PaulinKansasCity</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 02:23:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=165#comment-1635</guid> <description>Thanks David for those insights; to say you didn&#039;t you learn to do this in a day is an understatement!  Have a great weekend!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David for those insights; to say you didn&#8217;t you learn to do this in a day is an understatement!  Have a great weekend!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/06/quantitative-analysis-is-not-trivial-the-case-of-pb-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-1629</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:20:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=165#comment-1629</guid> <description>Paul, if capital is not scarce there are alternative calculations that can be run.  One would be to net out excess capital, and run PB-ROE on the adjusted book, with a reduction to earnings from reduced investment income/ increased interest paid, then add the capital back in at the end.
The other way is to figure out what is scarce in the industry.  It might be end user demand -- at that point substitute sales for book value, and at that point the regression becomes price-to-sales as a function of profit margins.
BriG, you can use any shareholders equity measure you like, so long as it is the same one in both variables.  I use trailing book for both.  Sometimes I will use it on a tangible basis, and/or ex-FAS 115, but changes both the P/B figure as well as the ROE figure.  They have to be kept consistent.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, if capital is not scarce there are alternative calculations that can be run.  One would be to net out excess capital, and run PB-ROE on the adjusted book, with a reduction to earnings from reduced investment income/ increased interest paid, then add the capital back in at the end.</p><p>The other way is to figure out what is scarce in the industry.  It might be end user demand &#8212; at that point substitute sales for book value, and at that point the regression becomes price-to-sales as a function of profit margins.</p><p>BriG, you can use any shareholders equity measure you like, so long as it is the same one in both variables.  I use trailing book for both.  Sometimes I will use it on a tangible basis, and/or ex-FAS 115, but changes both the P/B figure as well as the ROE figure.  They have to be kept consistent.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BriG</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/06/quantitative-analysis-is-not-trivial-the-case-of-pb-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-1628</link> <dc:creator>BriG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:38:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=165#comment-1628</guid> <description>Trying to get a handle on this, Zach Maxfield it would seem considers the E part of the ROE equation to be equal to current Bookvalue. I assume you’re using Average shareholders’ equity over time to compute the E part?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to get a handle on this, Zach Maxfield it would seem considers the E part of the ROE equation to be equal to current Bookvalue. I assume you’re using Average shareholders’ equity over time to compute the E part?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PaulinKansasCity</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/06/quantitative-analysis-is-not-trivial-the-case-of-pb-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-1624</link> <dc:creator>PaulinKansasCity</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:22:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=165#comment-1624</guid> <description>I hope Zack reads this; but thanks for the background story.  With regard to point 5 I think it could be argued that capital is not scarce currently; it&#039;s really the opportunity/ability to deploy it efficiently!  That is where the ability to evaluate management competence is so critical.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Zack reads this; but thanks for the background story.  With regard to point 5 I think it could be argued that capital is not scarce currently; it&#8217;s really the opportunity/ability to deploy it efficiently!  That is where the ability to evaluate management competence is so critical.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
