Thirteen Macroeconomic Musings

There are three great economic distortions in our world today that will eventually have to be unwound. All of them are temporarily self-reinforcing, so they will persist until something breaks. Here they are:

  • Recycling the US current account deficit.
  • Too much speculation in leveraged credit markets.
  • Too much speculation from private equity investors.

I could add a fourth, willingness of institutions to invest in weakly funded structures, like hedge funds, and anything else with liquid liabilities and illiquid assets, but that is for another day. Tonight, I want to focus primarily on the first of those issues, the consequences of the US current account deficit. Here goes:

  1. Almost all bond managers love positive carry. It is the lure of free money, and it works most of the time. Borrow cheaply and invest the money in something that yields more. That simple idea lies behind most of the excesses in our debt markets globally, and fuels the three excesses listed above. With currencies, market player borrow in yen and Swiss francs, and invest in higher yielding currencies like the New Zealand Dollar. Even major corporations like Citigroup borrow in yen, because the rates are low.
  2. When a country sends more goods to the US than it receives back, there is a natural inflationary effect. The local population buys goods and services, not US bonds, yet as banks accumulate the bonds, considering them to be part of their reserves, the balance sheets of the banks expand, because increased capital allows them to make more loans, which adds to the buying power of individuals and corporation, and can lead to more inflation. To resist the inflation, a country can let its currency rise versus the dollar, making exports less competitive, and increasing the willingness to import. This has happened in Thailand, India, and South Korea. Once this happens in enough nations, interest rates will rise in the US. We will send more goods to balance the accounts, and fewer bonds.
  3. Here you can get a look at the dollar reserve levels of many nations. China has been absorbing a lot of dollar claims.
  4. Thinking about inflation, wages are rising in China, particularly for those that work in export-oriented sectors. That is leading to rising prices for exports to the US. That will eventually have an upward impact on US price inflation.
  5. Now, inflation is not a serious concern yet in Japan or Switzerland. But if it did become an issue, the carry trade would end rapidly. Interest rates would be forced up rapidly, and the cost of loans denominated in those currencies would rise as well, making the borrowing uneconomic. Personally, I think the yen is 20% undervalued; in a few years, the yen will correct, if not more.
  6. On a more positive note, Jim Griffin suggests that the economies of Europe and Japan may be heading into classical recoveries. If true, good for all of us, particularly if they buy US goods.
  7. Now, imbalances are not forever. The emerging markets ten years ago were fragile because they ran current account deficits. Today many of them have the high quality problem of surpluses (and the inflation they can engender). They are in a stronger position to deal with crises. The US, though is does not know it yet, is ina weaker position to deal with crises.
  8. On the “dark matter” debate, my position has been that the US has a big debt to the rest of the world, but that since the US invests in higher yielding investments abroad than foreigners do in the US, until recently, the US earned more from foreign investments than foreigners earned off of US investments. This WSJ blog post supports my contention. On net, the US contains risk-takers, and the returns have been good so far, but the foreign debt has become so great, that the added yield is not enough to keep up with what we have to pay out.
  9. The main thing that could go wrong here would be a trade war.? Now, one of those is not imminent, but the Doha round at the WTO has not been a success, and there is pressure in many nations to restrict trade, or foreign ownership of assets.? If one wants to destroy the gains from trade, that would be the way to go.
  10. The 10-year Treasury yield has gotten jumpy in this environment, closing the week out at 5.18%.? I would expect the yield to muddle between 4.75 and 5.50% through the remainder of the year.? This is a finely balanced environment, with reason for rates to rise and fall.? Thus I expect the muddle.
  11. Finally, three bits on debt and demographics.? The first is an article from the Wall Street Journal on how insurers are going after Baby Boomers.? This is just another factor in the yield seeking that I have been talking about.? Baby boomers want yield from their assets so that they can enjoy their retirement.? That yield-seeking is and will be a major force distorting the markets for years to come.? It is much easier to demand more yield from your assets than to save more.? In the long run, it is much harder to realize more yield from your assets than it is to save more.
  12. Don’t trust US Government estimates of the deficit; instead, look at the change in net liabilities, the way a corporation might do it.? That would balloon the paltry $250 billion deficit to $1.3 trillion.? I have been writing about this since 1992.? The US government will not make good on all the promises it has made in money with today’s purchasing power.? The tipping point is not here yet for when this becomes obvious, but I believe it will become clear within the next ten years.? Pity the next three presidents.
  13. Partly as a result of this, and greater labor competition from abroad, we are finally seeing some evidence that the current generation of young adults is not doing as well as their parents did.? This may be a case of increasing income inequality, so that the average can increase while the median decreases.? From my angle in society, this is happening.? A few motivated people are prospering, and many are muddling along.? Where my opinion differs here is that people are generally getting what they deserve; in a more competitive world, people have to compete harder than their parents did, in order to do better.? In general, people are not working harder, and so their results are falling behind those of their parents on an inflation adjusted basis.

Not to leave it on a down note, but that’s it for the evening.? Hope to write cheerier stuff next week.

7 thoughts on “Thirteen Macroeconomic Musings

  1. IOW the benefits of free trade are accruing to the few owners who can access foreign labor markets, and thus get greater returns on their capital, and the costs of free trade are accruing to workers, who get diminishing returns for their labor. I wonder what will happen ultimately in a democracy, where the many workers outnumber the few owners.

  2. The willingnes to lead a somewhat spartan life style (although go the third world to be embarassed by the American definitiion of spartan) seems to be in decline from my view dealing with retail clients. The symptom I see from retired folks is still the willingness to push the limits on their income; the income approach I favor is very similar to david’s balanced portfolios with cash reserves but I fight many battles to dissuade people from the “maximum yield approach”. Even though I hear frequently “we can live on less” I never see it unless forced upon the client. What I see in younger individuals is the lack of after tax assets from families that have $60,000 to $100,000 incomes. They all have decent homes; cars; boats; etc. I also see a lot of business people that have weak balance sheets; they have no major cash reserve to fund their businesses. we are seeing the price of this now in the smaller homebuilders.

    The best advice I can give anyone in their twenties out of school is to save after tax in addition to retirement/401(k); it is tough to start or buy a business without these assets (I was very lucky and learned this in college; I was student loan debt free by the time I was married at 25 and had been saving money). I am also seeing individuals in their 60s inheriting assets that on average will not make it to their children; these individuals live well compared to their parents and will probably draw down their assets unless they invest consistently well; no small challenge for all of us. I do see many individuals in their 50s and 60s subsidizing adult children lifestyles.

    In the context of above I believe Social Security retirement age/medicare will be moved up to the low 70s; it makes sense to me so it won’t happen!! I appreciate the blog reader’s patience with this post! Thanks to all.

  3. Hi David,

    Can you elaborate on this statement: “The US government will not make good on all the promises it has made in money with today?s purchasing power.” Are you suggesting that the US will experience higher inflation so the US government can use much cheaper dollars to pay its debts?

    thanks,
    Wade

  4. Government statistics on inflation are badly understated. I’ve been charging by grocerices on credit cards since 97 and I can see my monthy expenditures. Overall, my costs are up 18% since 2002.

    What I don’t understand is why short-term interest rates reflect the government’s reported rate of inflation and the not the real rate of inflation.

  5. Great comments Don; the early 20th century labor/capital battles could be what is in store for our country;

  6. David,
    It is possible you are right about the “not working hard enough” part of the analysis, but I think that the analysis is incomplete.
    I’ll draw on Austrian economics to highlight the fact that inflation, especially high rates of inflation, by definition create inequalities in income (between those who receive the inflated money first and those who get the trickle down effects), thereby eroding the middle class. Extreme rates of inflation of course lead to the breakdown of societies.
    So my thought is that given the low levels of inflation, the answer is somewhere in between – your view of lack of sufficient hard work, and the Austrian view of the harmful effects of inflation.

  7. David

    I am struggling to understand your concerns about the trade deficit. First, this is a balanced equation — by definition everything adds to zero, which means a capital surplus to offset the deficit. Everyone seems to pick on the US and yet other parts of the world are just as imbalanced — again by definition.

    As far as the carry trade goes — that seems like more of an issue with Japanese policies and people’s willingness to speculate than with US policies.

    Second, these are aggregate numbers based on millions upon millions of individual voluntary exchanges — no one is forcing those countries to take our dollars for their goods — they do it willingly.

    Third, in this globalized market, products or parts can be routed through several countries before arriving at their ultimate destination — seems very likely the government must run into definitional issues when calculating these trade numbers.

    As far as investors using too much leverage — I am not going to argue with you there — I realize you believe the 3 issues are all connected but I would argue we have had a trade deficit for almost all of our history yet I do not believe we have had the kind of leverage that is in practice today for most of our history.

    I just find it hard to argue with Milton Friedman who, if memory serves, described a trade deficit as the closest thing to a free lunch.

    the blog is great — thanks for writing

Comments are closed.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira