<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portfolio Notes &#8212; July 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2007/07/19/portfolio-notes-july-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/19/portfolio-notes-july-2007/</link>
	<description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:31:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Merkel</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/19/portfolio-notes-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2219</link>
		<dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=184#comment-2219</guid>
		<description>Not that I don&#039;t like CNA, but it doesn&#039;t have the leverage to equities that HIG does.  AIG doesn&#039;t have that leverage either.  Of course on a day like today, who wants leverage to equities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I don&#8217;t like CNA, but it doesn&#8217;t have the leverage to equities that HIG does.  AIG doesn&#8217;t have that leverage either.  Of course on a day like today, who wants leverage to equities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/19/portfolio-notes-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2155</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=184#comment-2155</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you are willing to speculate, might I recommend FSL? They manage their business well, though they are new.&quot;

Did you mean to say FSR?

Otherwise, very interesting post, as always.  Thanks for your work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you are willing to speculate, might I recommend FSL? They manage their business well, though they are new.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you mean to say FSR?</p>
<p>Otherwise, very interesting post, as always.  Thanks for your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Milos</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/19/portfolio-notes-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2151</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Milos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=184#comment-2151</guid>
		<description>David,

Do you refer to the turnarounds component as the &quot;Nero&quot; part of your portfolio?  After all, &quot;Rome wasn&#039;t burnt in a day...&quot; LOL

How about combining your asset sensitive life insurer and low catastrophe expense insurer strategy together with a multiline insurer such as HIG, CNA, AIG?  Seems to me that would be the easiest way to play it.

Steve
long CNA for a trade, might buy the others</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Do you refer to the turnarounds component as the &#8220;Nero&#8221; part of your portfolio?  After all, &#8220;Rome wasn&#8217;t burnt in a day&#8230;&#8221; LOL</p>
<p>How about combining your asset sensitive life insurer and low catastrophe expense insurer strategy together with a multiline insurer such as HIG, CNA, AIG?  Seems to me that would be the easiest way to play it.</p>
<p>Steve<br />
long CNA for a trade, might buy the others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
