<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Five Pillars of Liquidity</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2007/07/24/the-five-pillars-of-liquidity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/24/the-five-pillars-of-liquidity/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jack</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/24/the-five-pillars-of-liquidity/comment-page-1/#comment-2309</link> <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 04:55:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=190#comment-2309</guid> <description>Liquidity more simply defined is the flow of credit from lenders (investors) to borrowers; it is the lifeblood of capitalism.  There is never a shortage of borrowers so liquidity is controlled by the lenders and its availibility is reflected in exchange rates, interest rates and rate differentials.  When liquidity is restrained markets correct, when it expands unrestrained, lenders will eventually disperse unacceptible risk into the derivatives markets where quants develop diversification models that underestimate risk  resulting in mark to market and an inevitible financial crisis and a contraction in lending.  The top of the cycle is close at hand when borrowers attempt to monetize their debt through the issuance of equity.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liquidity more simply defined is the flow of credit from lenders (investors) to borrowers; it is the lifeblood of capitalism.  There is never a shortage of borrowers so liquidity is controlled by the lenders and its availibility is reflected in exchange rates, interest rates and rate differentials.  When liquidity is restrained markets correct, when it expands unrestrained, lenders will eventually disperse unacceptible risk into the derivatives markets where quants develop diversification models that underestimate risk  resulting in mark to market and an inevitible financial crisis and a contraction in lending.  The top of the cycle is close at hand when borrowers attempt to monetize their debt through the issuance of equity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Deborahd</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/24/the-five-pillars-of-liquidity/comment-page-1/#comment-2275</link> <dc:creator>Deborahd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:01:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=190#comment-2275</guid> <description>Number 5 is interesting.
The baby boomers do expect ever so much from their children, cut off their job prospects and earning power and then some how expect that they will be able to afford the tax burden of their retirement, the pension and the health care...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 5 is interesting.</p><p>The baby boomers do expect ever so much from their children, cut off their job prospects and earning power and then some how expect that they will be able to afford the tax burden of their retirement, the pension and the health care&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steven Milos</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/24/the-five-pillars-of-liquidity/comment-page-1/#comment-2232</link> <dc:creator>Steven Milos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:21:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=190#comment-2232</guid> <description>David,
I would actually argue that in Japan&#039;s case it&#039;s a separate effect, and not part of the recycling of the trade deficit, at least in part.  True, the BOJ keeps rates low partially to make it unattractive to buy and hold yen (hence making it more difficult for Japanese exporters, and stimulating their GDP as a result).  However, I would argue that this effect, and policy motivation, is separate from the recycling of trade flows.  Even if the US trade deficit were lower, and USD/JPY traded stronger, I would suspect that the BOJ would keep rates relatively low compared to other G10 rates (although perhaps slightly higher from these levels) in order to stimulate the domestic (non-export oriented) economy of Japan.
As for Japanese retail investor flows, given the pressing demographic needs of Japanese society, I expect that they will continue to diversify into a variety of foreign investments unless and until the BOJ raises rates substantially, which seems highly unlikely at present.  The global stretch for yield that you mentioned as Piller 5 is very real.
P.S. - As for today&#039;s market, do you still have that Wayback Machine from a previous posting?  I wouldn&#039;t mind going back to yesterday and putting on a few hedges....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p><p>I would actually argue that in Japan&#8217;s case it&#8217;s a separate effect, and not part of the recycling of the trade deficit, at least in part.  True, the BOJ keeps rates low partially to make it unattractive to buy and hold yen (hence making it more difficult for Japanese exporters, and stimulating their GDP as a result).  However, I would argue that this effect, and policy motivation, is separate from the recycling of trade flows.  Even if the US trade deficit were lower, and USD/JPY traded stronger, I would suspect that the BOJ would keep rates relatively low compared to other G10 rates (although perhaps slightly higher from these levels) in order to stimulate the domestic (non-export oriented) economy of Japan.</p><p>As for Japanese retail investor flows, given the pressing demographic needs of Japanese society, I expect that they will continue to diversify into a variety of foreign investments unless and until the BOJ raises rates substantially, which seems highly unlikely at present.  The global stretch for yield that you mentioned as Piller 5 is very real.</p><p>P.S. &#8211; As for today&#8217;s market, do you still have that Wayback Machine from a previous posting?  I wouldn&#8217;t mind going back to yesterday and putting on a few hedges&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/24/the-five-pillars-of-liquidity/comment-page-1/#comment-2217</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:20:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=190#comment-2217</guid> <description>Steve,
You&#039;re right, I omitted those, and that is a partial oversight.  Partial, because the carry trades as they affect the US are part of number 3.  Globally, they are a separate effect, because you can look at how NZ is getting flooded with demand for its debt, pushing the currency up more and more.
So far we have not seen any large liquidation of the carry trade.  We still have Japanese investors trying to make money off of higher interest rates abroad.  But perhaps they will be the last to know?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p><p>You&#8217;re right, I omitted those, and that is a partial oversight.  Partial, because the carry trades as they affect the US are part of number 3.  Globally, they are a separate effect, because you can look at how NZ is getting flooded with demand for its debt, pushing the currency up more and more.</p><p>So far we have not seen any large liquidation of the carry trade.  We still have Japanese investors trying to make money off of higher interest rates abroad.  But perhaps they will be the last to know?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Milos</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/07/24/the-five-pillars-of-liquidity/comment-page-1/#comment-2216</link> <dc:creator>Steve Milos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:07:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=190#comment-2216</guid> <description>David,
You omitted the various carry trades, usually funded mainly via yen, less so via Swiss francs or other low yielders (as distinct from the current account deficit recycling or Japanese retail investor diversification into high yielders).  As far as I can tell, that trade is still extant, although the yen has been strengthening a little lately.  David Rosenberg of Merrill had an interesting observation yesterday in that recently the yen has been a prime beneficiary of any flight-to-quality, as risky assets are liquidated and short yen positions covered.  I believe that is the logic behind your previously disclosed long yen position.  Just my two cents...worth about two yen now too...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p><p>You omitted the various carry trades, usually funded mainly via yen, less so via Swiss francs or other low yielders (as distinct from the current account deficit recycling or Japanese retail investor diversification into high yielders).  As far as I can tell, that trade is still extant, although the yen has been strengthening a little lately.  David Rosenberg of Merrill had an interesting observation yesterday in that recently the yen has been a prime beneficiary of any flight-to-quality, as risky assets are liquidated and short yen positions covered.  I believe that is the logic behind your previously disclosed long yen position.  Just my two cents&#8230;worth about two yen now too&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
