<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: For Wonks Only &#8212; The Math of Volatility Mean-Reversion</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2007/08/01/for-wonks-only-the-math-of-volatility-mean-reversion-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/08/01/for-wonks-only-the-math-of-volatility-mean-reversion-2/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/08/01/for-wonks-only-the-math-of-volatility-mean-reversion-2/comment-page-1/#comment-18119</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:07:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2007/08/01/for-wonks-only-the-math-of-volatility-mean-reversion-2/#comment-18119</guid> <description>Yes, it is rejected.  The t-statistics are 6.32 and 6.37 respectively.  The prob-values are roughly 3 in a billion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is rejected.  The t-statistics are 6.32 and 6.37 respectively.  The prob-values are roughly 3 in a billion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kester</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/08/01/for-wonks-only-the-math-of-volatility-mean-reversion-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17798</link> <dc:creator>Kester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:02:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2007/08/01/for-wonks-only-the-math-of-volatility-mean-reversion-2/#comment-17798</guid> <description>Can you reject the hypothesis of a random walk, i.e. alpha = 0, beta = 1.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you reject the hypothesis of a random walk, i.e. alpha = 0, beta = 1.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: andy</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/08/01/for-wonks-only-the-math-of-volatility-mean-reversion-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2530</link> <dc:creator>andy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:40:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2007/08/01/for-wonks-only-the-math-of-volatility-mean-reversion-2/#comment-2530</guid> <description>Hi, I am currently developing a mean reversion model for implied volatility but i need some sample data or webiste that provide the mean reversion rate with the option pricing to validate my work.
do you have any ide where i can find it ?
Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am currently developing a mean reversion model for implied volatility but i need some sample data or webiste that provide the mean reversion rate with the option pricing to validate my work.</p><p>do you have any ide where i can find it ?</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
