<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Musing About Fed Policy and Credit Crunches</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2007/09/08/musing-about-fed-policy-and-credit-crunches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/09/08/musing-about-fed-policy-and-credit-crunches/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: James Dailey</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/09/08/musing-about-fed-policy-and-credit-crunches/comment-page-1/#comment-4973</link> <dc:creator>James Dailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:56:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2007/09/08/musing-about-fed-policy-and-credit-crunches/#comment-4973</guid> <description>I wish to make two points. First, in hindsight, as I have posted in previous comments, it is quite clear that the global central banks have lost control of the money supply. The &quot;tightening&quot; of the Fed over the past 3 years did nothing to offset massive credit creation from both banks and non-regulated entities. Many would argue (like me) that real interest rates have been negative for quite some time if any reasonable gauge of inflation (yes even CPI inflation). We are likely in for the other side of this cycle now - the credit contraction will also render the Fed largely powerless.
My second point is that &quot;ignoring derivatives&quot; makes zero sense to me. The fact is that increased leverage increases risk at an increasingly exponential rate. Yes in theory a reasonable level of derivatives leverage would reduce systemic risk as risk is hedged more efficiently. However, we passed that sign on the road many exits back. The global EXPLOSION in derivatives growth over the past 3 years has likely increased systemic risks massively. We likely to see many weird market developments as over-leveraged players unwind positions due to forced selling. The recent quant fund debacle is just the tip of the iceberg in my opinion.
Personally, I think the mosaic is fairly simple at this point - the timing of the emergence of the rest of the iceberg is what is extremely uncertain. Credit creation has exploded globally outside of the direct control of central banks and derivatives have been the tools of ignorance. This will be the epicenter of the eventual unwind in my opinion and to ignore it is to ignore one of the most critical variables in the marketplace.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish to make two points. First, in hindsight, as I have posted in previous comments, it is quite clear that the global central banks have lost control of the money supply. The &#8220;tightening&#8221; of the Fed over the past 3 years did nothing to offset massive credit creation from both banks and non-regulated entities. Many would argue (like me) that real interest rates have been negative for quite some time if any reasonable gauge of inflation (yes even CPI inflation). We are likely in for the other side of this cycle now &#8211; the credit contraction will also render the Fed largely powerless.</p><p>My second point is that &#8220;ignoring derivatives&#8221; makes zero sense to me. The fact is that increased leverage increases risk at an increasingly exponential rate. Yes in theory a reasonable level of derivatives leverage would reduce systemic risk as risk is hedged more efficiently. However, we passed that sign on the road many exits back. The global EXPLOSION in derivatives growth over the past 3 years has likely increased systemic risks massively. We likely to see many weird market developments as over-leveraged players unwind positions due to forced selling. The recent quant fund debacle is just the tip of the iceberg in my opinion.</p><p>Personally, I think the mosaic is fairly simple at this point &#8211; the timing of the emergence of the rest of the iceberg is what is extremely uncertain. Credit creation has exploded globally outside of the direct control of central banks and derivatives have been the tools of ignorance. This will be the epicenter of the eventual unwind in my opinion and to ignore it is to ignore one of the most critical variables in the marketplace.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kirk Lindstrom</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/09/08/musing-about-fed-policy-and-credit-crunches/comment-page-1/#comment-4969</link> <dc:creator>Kirk Lindstrom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 23:31:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2007/09/08/musing-about-fed-policy-and-credit-crunches/#comment-4969</guid> <description>Chart of ECRI&#039;s WLI Growth Rate vs US GDP: 09/09/07
http://kirklindstrom.blogspot.com/2007/09/chart-of-ecris-wli-growth-rate-vs-us.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chart of ECRI&#8217;s WLI Growth Rate vs US GDP: 09/09/07<br
/> <a
href="http://kirklindstrom.blogspot.com/2007/09/chart-of-ecris-wli-growth-rate-vs-us.html" rel="nofollow">http://kirklindstrom.blogspot.com/2007/09/chart-of-ecris-wli-growth-rate-vs-us.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
