Investing in a Stagflationary Environment

I intend to get back to answering more reader questions, and doing it through posts.  I’ve been somewhat derelict in responding to comments, and I want to do it, but time has been short.  Here is a start, because I think the answer would be relevant to a lot of readers.

From a reader in Canada:

I enjoy your writing as many of your comments generate a wider perspective than my own.  There is always something to learn.

I was too young to appreciate the last stagflationary period.  Yet, I need to manage my portfolio.  My approach is more ETF based, whereas, I see that you prefer specific stocks.

I struggle in anticipating the currency impact on my foreign holdings.  I’m a Canadian based investor.  The simple solution is to pull in my exposure and be more Canada centric.  This idea conflicts with my goal to have my portfolio weighted in similar fashion to the global markets (i.e., Canada is a very small percentage relative to the total).  I also do not subscribe to the excessive weighting in gold as a major investment theme.  To me, it’s insurance to help offset risk elsewhere.

I’m not asking for specifics as you are not familiar with my situation.  Do you have any recommended reading or suggestions to help me test my thoughts and to identify options, so that I can arrive at a better decision?

Well, I’m not that old either.  During the last stagflation, I was aged 13 to 22, from junior high through my Master’s Degree in Economics at Johns Hopkins.  That said, I have read a lot on economic history, so I understand the era reasonably.  I also spent many of my Friday evenings as a teenager watching Wall Street Week with my first teacher on investments.  (Hi, Mom! :) )  Another thing I remember is being the student representative to the school board for two years 1977-1979, when our district in Brookfield, Wisconsin decided to do a wide number of capital improvements in order to save energy, at the peak of the “energy crisis.”  I remember that the payback periods were 15 years or so, not counting interest that they would have to pay on the munis that they issued.  No way that project saved money on a net present value basis.  (And it was depressing to see 2/3rds of the windows covered up.)

During the last Stagflation, bonds were called “certificates of confiscation” by many professionals in fixed income.   It paid to have your fixed income assets as short as possible.  Money market funds, a new invention at the time, were the optimal place to be until about 1982, when the cycle shifted, and the longest zero coupon bonds were the new best place to be.  Timing the shift between cycles is difficult, so don’t try to time it exactly, but add more longer bonds as long rates rise.  Right now, I would stay in money market funds, inflation protected bonds, and foreign currency denominated bonds.  You have enough Canadian exposure, so aside from you money market funds, consider bond investments in the yen, Swiss franc and Euro.

As for equities, pricing power is critical.  Who can raise prices more than the cost of their inputs?  Producers of global commodities like oil, metals, etc., typically do well here.  Financial companies with short duration assets or exposure to hard assets should do better here.  Staples should do better versus durables.  Growth investing should beat value investing (uh, oh, what do I do?  All of my processes are geared toward value investing).   Cyclical names may beat them both.

If inflation really takes off, hard assets will offer some shelter though housing will lag until the inflation of real estate exceeds the deterioration of the debt.  I occasionally like gold, but it’s not a panacea.  I’d rather own the economically necessary commodities.

But what if stagflation does not become a reality?  That’s why we diversify.  I don’t tie my whole portfolio to one macroeconomic view.  Instead, I merely tilt it that way, leaving enough exposure elsewhere to compensateif my economic forecast is wrong.  I am a value investor, and almost always have a a few companies that will do well even if my economic forecast fails.

In summary: keep your domestic bonds short.  Diversify into foreign currency bonds.  Keep a diversified equity portfolio, but focus on companies that are immune to, or can benefit from inflation.






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Asset Allocation, Bonds, Macroeconomics, Personal Finance, Portfolio Management, Stocks, Value Investing | RSS 2.0 |

3 Responses to Investing in a Stagflationary Environment

  1. [During the last Stagflation, bonds were called “certificates of confiscation” by many professionals in fixed income.]

    Funny stuff. Could you compare the total return of a 10-yr Treasury bought fresh and new anywhere from 1976-1980, and held to maturity (sending the coupons to cash) — to the total return from an equal-sized basket of stocks or residential real estate over the same time period?

  2. I don’t want to double dip, but do want to clarify, so please use “risk-adjusted returns” in the previous comment, re: returns on bonds. As a non-institutional investor who doesn’t care as much about the “mark to model” on any bonds I would hold, I would view double-digit Treasuries as free money, especially in light of long-term returns on stocks barely cracking the DD with divvies included …

  3. Paul says:

    Hi David! Great website! How would utilties do in a stagflation environment? Thanks…

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin