<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Years From Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2007/09/29/ten-years-from-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alephblog.com/2007/09/29/ten-years-from-now/</link>
	<description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:50:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dailey</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2007/09/29/ten-years-from-now/comment-page-1/#comment-6727</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2007/09/29/ten-years-from-now/#comment-6727</guid>
		<description>I think your post is very useful but that it raises some critical issues about successfully forecasting future inflation/real rates. Your study period includes a period where 3 major versions of CPI existing. There is the pre-Reagan CPI, the pre-Boskin CPI and the current. John Williams at shadow statistics calculates all three. The curren pre-Reagan CPI is running over 10% so &quot;real rates&quot; based on that would be negative 6-7%! The pre-Boskin is I think 5-6% which would still produce negative real rates....and the Fed is cutting rates! 

I wish anyone luck trying to forecast 10 year hence real rates or inflation given this mix. My personal opinion is that due to fiat currencies they are likely to be much higher unless central banks allow a deflationary credit contraction to take force without trying to inflate. History suggests that they all try to inflate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your post is very useful but that it raises some critical issues about successfully forecasting future inflation/real rates. Your study period includes a period where 3 major versions of CPI existing. There is the pre-Reagan CPI, the pre-Boskin CPI and the current. John Williams at shadow statistics calculates all three. The curren pre-Reagan CPI is running over 10% so &#8220;real rates&#8221; based on that would be negative 6-7%! The pre-Boskin is I think 5-6% which would still produce negative real rates&#8230;.and the Fed is cutting rates! </p>
<p>I wish anyone luck trying to forecast 10 year hence real rates or inflation given this mix. My personal opinion is that due to fiat currencies they are likely to be much higher unless central banks allow a deflationary credit contraction to take force without trying to inflate. History suggests that they all try to inflate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Milos</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2007/09/29/ten-years-from-now/comment-page-1/#comment-6720</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Milos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 05:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2007/09/29/ten-years-from-now/#comment-6720</guid>
		<description>David,

Very interesting results.  However, as a practical matter, I doubt that it&#039;s that useful.  I don&#039;t know this for sure, but I highly doubt that 10 year TIPS, or any other fixed income instrument, is a successful predictor of what inflation and real interest rates will be ten years hence.  Heck, people have enough trouble figuring out what FOMC policy will be next meeting, let alone how loose or tight policy will be 10 years from now, and hence the extent to which the money supply is inflated.  In that condition of uncertainty, my own personal preference is to purchase shares of companies with strong managements, a demonstrated ability to grow cash flows, an ability to produce and manage free cash flows effectively, and with hopefully some ability to raise prices at a similar rate to the CPI or some other inflation guage.  But that&#039;s just me - I&#039;ve been wrong before, and will be again, no doubt about that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Very interesting results.  However, as a practical matter, I doubt that it&#8217;s that useful.  I don&#8217;t know this for sure, but I highly doubt that 10 year TIPS, or any other fixed income instrument, is a successful predictor of what inflation and real interest rates will be ten years hence.  Heck, people have enough trouble figuring out what FOMC policy will be next meeting, let alone how loose or tight policy will be 10 years from now, and hence the extent to which the money supply is inflated.  In that condition of uncertainty, my own personal preference is to purchase shares of companies with strong managements, a demonstrated ability to grow cash flows, an ability to produce and manage free cash flows effectively, and with hopefully some ability to raise prices at a similar rate to the CPI or some other inflation guage.  But that&#8217;s just me &#8211; I&#8217;ve been wrong before, and will be again, no doubt about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis F Hill</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2007/09/29/ten-years-from-now/comment-page-1/#comment-6713</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis F Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2007/09/29/ten-years-from-now/#comment-6713</guid>
		<description>David

This is a very nice analysis.  In the little investing that I am able to do I ask myself &quot;How hard is my money working for me&quot;.  Your article puts the outside influeneces (like inflation) in greater perspective.

Thanks, Louie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David</p>
<p>This is a very nice analysis.  In the little investing that I am able to do I ask myself &#8220;How hard is my money working for me&#8221;.  Your article puts the outside influeneces (like inflation) in greater perspective.</p>
<p>Thanks, Louie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
