<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ten Chosen Items from the Current Market Troubles</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2007/11/27/ten-chosen-items-from-the-current-market-troubles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/11/27/ten-chosen-items-from-the-current-market-troubles/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Josh Stern</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2007/11/27/ten-chosen-items-from-the-current-market-troubles/comment-page-1/#comment-14830</link> <dc:creator>Josh Stern</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:28:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2007/11/27/ten-chosen-items-from-the-current-market-troubles/#comment-14830</guid> <description>Re: Point 9, estimating mortgage losses.  The figure is believable to me also.  Within the article, the author writes that part of it is connected with an estimate of 14% default rate on subprime, which is described as plausible but hedging on the pessimistic side of expected.   But as far as I can tell, the ABX indices at markit.com which are so widely used predict a much higher rate of *loss* if/when they are construed as efficient prices.   That &quot;market&quot; goes down day after and seems totally out of whack with reasonable assessments of fundamentals (as  bad as those are), but yet is used in a lot of mark to market pricing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Point 9, estimating mortgage losses.  The figure is believable to me also.  Within the article, the author writes that part of it is connected with an estimate of 14% default rate on subprime, which is described as plausible but hedging on the pessimistic side of expected.   But as far as I can tell, the ABX indices at markit.com which are so widely used predict a much higher rate of *loss* if/when they are construed as efficient prices.   That &#8220;market&#8221; goes down day after and seems totally out of whack with reasonable assessments of fundamentals (as  bad as those are), but yet is used in a lot of mark to market pricing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
