The Aleph Blog » Blog Archive » Notes on Fed Policy and Short-term Credit

Notes on Fed Policy and Short-term Credit

  1. I just did my usual review of my FOMC indicators.  The FOMC should cut 25 basis points at the December 11th meeting.  Whatever the formal “bias” is, the verbiage will be a little of this and the a little of that, something like:  “Yes, we are worried about the solvency of some financial institutions.  That’s why we cut.  But this cut very likely should be enough, so don’t expect anymore.  Now leave us alone.”
  2. So Goldman sees a 3% Fed funds rate in mid-2008So do I.  Small moves in FOMC policy don’t achieve the desired ends, either when policy is rising or falling.  Large cumulative moves are needed to affect the behavior of market participants.
  3. The TED [Treasury - Eurodollar] spread is at its largest one-year moving average since 1990.  That’s significant short-term credit stress to the large banks, and it is worth watching.  It’s not just a US phenomenon either; in the UK the banks are under stress as well.
  4. Residential housing is driving the decisions of the FOMC.  As prices fall, more houses become non-refinancable, and non-salable (except at a loss).  All it takes then is for a problem to happen… death, disability, divorce, unemployment, or casualty, and another house goes on the market because of insolvency.
  5. So, I agree with Accrued Interest (great blog, doesn’t everyone want to read about bonds?).  Many Fed governors talk between meetings, and they trot out their baseline scenario, but often it is the worry of avoiding a somewhat likely negative scenario that can drive policy.
  6. At some level though, if the dollar falls far enough, the FOMC will have to reverse course, as Caroline Baum has pointed out.  Remember, that’s what drove the FOMC to tighten in 1986-87.
  7. Of course, the credit stress in the short end of the market has led some money market fund sponsors to bail out their funds (Legg Mason, Wachovia and B of A, while GE lets a pseudo-money market fund take a hit.  Remember, with money market funds, it’s not wise to stretch for yield, particularly not in bear markets for credit.
  8. One more weak Commercial Paper [CP] funding structure: using it as part of a “super senior” tranche in CDOs.  Now in this case, the collateral is weak — subprime mortgage loans, but this could be true of any CDO where the collateral comes under stress in the future, including high yield corporate bonds.  I wrote about this three months ago, but this one is still unraveling.
  9. I haven’t talked about it, because I wasn’t sure I had anything to add to the discussion, but the M-LEC, or super-SIV, proposed by the major banks seems like hooey to me.  After all, if this shifting of assets from one pocket to another created value, why wasn’t it done before?  It doesn’t change the underlying asset prices, and for the banks as a whole, it is just a zero sum game, unless new parties enter, at which point, they will have to offer a discount to move the paper, which eliminates one of the reasons for doing the deal.
  10. Putting another nail in the coffin, HSBC takes their SIVs onto their own balance sheet, cleaning up their own financing, and making it more difficult for the other banks who want to do the Super-SIV.

What an interesting time in the short-term debt markets.  For now, prudence dictates staying high quality in what financial institutions you lend to short term.

Bonds, Currencies, Fed Policy, Macroeconomics, Real Estate and Mortgages, Speculation | RSS 2.0 |

One Response to Notes on Fed Policy and Short-term Credit

  1. Aaron says:

    3% Fed Funds rate in mid 2008 is a pretty bullish prediction for equities one would have to think. Do you think the Fed will keep inching by 25 basis points or end up making additional 50 basis points moves?


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.

Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.

Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin