I was impressed with what Charles Kirk had to say regarding AAII and Stock Screening.  I’m a lifetime member of AAII, and I’ve used their stock screening software for years, long before I was a professional.  I was also impressed to note in the recent issue that two of my four buys in the fourth quarter were buys in the shadow stock portfolio, which has done very well over the years.

Back to Charles Kirk, if I can quote a small part of his piece:

When looking over the information, among many things I noticed include the fact that 7 stock screens have posted gains for every year over the past 10 years. Screens with this amazing consistency include Graham’s Defensive Investor, Price-To-Sales, Zweig, PEG With Est Growth, PEG With Hist Growth, and two of O’Shaughnessy’s screens – Small Cap Growth & Value and Growth. Few screening strategies can produce gains year after year as these have and there’s something to be learned from them.

Looking through and comparing the criteria between all of these screens, in essence they were seeking four simple things: 1) growing earnings per share over various time frames, 2) strong sales growth, 3) an attractive valuation (often using price-to-sales), and 4) relative strength.

Though I may quibble with O’Shaughnessy’s methodology, this is consistent with what he found in his book What Works on Wall Street.   That said, though I am more agnostic about market capitalization, as I looked across the shadow stock portfolio, which is a small cap deep value portfolio, it confirmed to me that there are a lot of cheap stocks to buy in this environment.  There are good gains to be had in the future, even if past performance has suffered.

Now to approach it from a different angle.  I mentioned how much I like the CXO Advisory blog.   One page to visit is the Big Ideas page, if you like academic finance papers.  I want to give you my short synopsis of what seems to work:

• Cheap valuation, particularly low price-to-book (though I like cheap price-to-everything… book, earnings, sales, dividends, EBITDA)
• Price momentum
• Low accrual accounting entries as a fraction of earnings or assets
• Piotroski’s accounting criteria
• Low net stock issuance
• Positive earnings surprises
• Low historical return volatility
• Illiquidity, which is a proxy for size and neglect

There are other prizes on that page, including mean-reversion, an improved Fed Model, Dollar-weighted vs. Time-weighted returns, limitations on academic financial research, demography, etc.

I would simply tell the fundamental investors in my audience to think about these issues.  Let me summarize them one more time:

• Look for a cheap valuation.
• Look for mean reversion, but don’t try to catch a falling knife.
• Grab positive price momentum and earnings surprises.
• Look for sound accounting, and management that is loath to dilute shareholders.
• Avoid volatile stocks
• Look for neglected stocks

That’s my my quick summary for what seems to work in stock selection.  I invite commentary on this.  I downloaded a lot of the papers cited, and will be reading them over the next few months.

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 17th, 2008 at 12:13 am and is filed under Academic Finance, Portfolio Management, Quantitative Methods, Value Investing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.