<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Could Investors Manipulate the Fed?</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2008/01/29/could-investors-manipulate-the-fed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/01/29/could-investors-manipulate-the-fed/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/01/29/could-investors-manipulate-the-fed/comment-page-1/#comment-16668</link> <dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:06:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2008/01/29/could-investors-manipulate-the-fed/#comment-16668</guid> <description>The flaw in saying that &quot;anticipated policy moves have no impact&quot; is that it assumes the &quot;market&quot; is something monolithic – which it is not.  Despite any illusion of unanimity, there are always some players, and there is always some money, on the alternative outcomes.  Until the probability curve collapses and the box is actually opened, we have no way of knowing if the cat is really dead.
:-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flaw in saying that &#8220;anticipated policy moves have no impact&#8221; is that it assumes the &#8220;market&#8221; is something monolithic – which it is not.  Despite any illusion of unanimity, there are always some players, and there is always some money, on the alternative outcomes.  Until the probability curve collapses and the box is actually opened, we have no way of knowing if the cat is really dead.</p><p> <img
src='http://alephblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/01/29/could-investors-manipulate-the-fed/comment-page-1/#comment-16660</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:46:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2008/01/29/could-investors-manipulate-the-fed/#comment-16660</guid> <description>Since the market is looking at the same data as the Fed, knows the criteria used by the Fed, and even has speeches and statements for guidance, we should expect a correlation.  Your point raises the question of direction of causation.  I think that the Fed tries to influence market expectations.
Here is something you can do easily to test your hypothesis.  I think you will also find it to be fun.  Go back to the time of your anecdote and read a few of the old FOMC transcripts.
I think you will quickly find the answer to your question.
Jeff</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the market is looking at the same data as the Fed, knows the criteria used by the Fed, and even has speeches and statements for guidance, we should expect a correlation.  Your point raises the question of direction of causation.  I think that the Fed tries to influence market expectations.</p><p>Here is something you can do easily to test your hypothesis.  I think you will also find it to be fun.  Go back to the time of your anecdote and read a few of the old FOMC transcripts.</p><p>I think you will quickly find the answer to your question.</p><p>Jeff</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
