<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Is the PEG Ratio a Valid Concept?</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: alephblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One Dozen Thoughts on Bonds, Financials and Financial Markets</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-27005</link> <dc:creator>alephblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One Dozen Thoughts on Bonds, Financials and Financial Markets</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:37:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/#comment-27005</guid> <description>[...] Thanks to Bill Rempel for his comments on my PEG ratio piece. I did not have access to backtesting software, but now I do. I didn&#8217;t realize how much was [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Bill Rempel for his comments on my PEG ratio piece. I did not have access to backtesting software, but now I do. I didn&#8217;t realize how much was [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-16972</link> <dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:52:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/#comment-16972</guid> <description>Here are the results of holding the 30 largest (by market cap) stocks in the S&amp;P 500 when they have PEG under 1.00 and price over $5.
http://keelix.com/backtester/auth/displayjob.tt?id=204957
Switch out monthly.
Returns DOUBLE the S&amp;P 500&#039;s annualized gain since Aug 1997, with only a 50% increase in annual standard deviation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the results of holding the 30 largest (by market cap) stocks in the S&amp;P 500 when they have PEG under 1.00 and price over $5.</p><p><a
href="http://keelix.com/backtester/auth/displayjob.tt?id=204957" rel="nofollow">http://keelix.com/backtester/auth/displayjob.tt?id=204957</a></p><p>Switch out monthly.</p><p>Returns DOUBLE the S&amp;P 500&#8242;s annualized gain since Aug 1997, with only a 50% increase in annual standard deviation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh Stern</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-16970</link> <dc:creator>Josh Stern</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:08:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/#comment-16970</guid> <description>Morningstar&#039;s screener calculates the &quot;PEG payback period&quot; as the number of years to earn the current market cap assuming linear growth.   That could be improved by using some sort of profile growth curve (as you&#039;ve done) and figuring the time to earn the current enterprise value instead.   This might be a better number for value investor comparisons.   My impression of most growth investors is that rather than hoping to make money by having their stock grow into a value stock, they are hoping to make money by buying stocks that stretch out the profile - i.e. they are looking for a &quot;margin in safety&quot; in the number of years of higher growth that are expected going forward.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morningstar&#8217;s screener calculates the &#8220;PEG payback period&#8221; as the number of years to earn the current market cap assuming linear growth.   That could be improved by using some sort of profile growth curve (as you&#8217;ve done) and figuring the time to earn the current enterprise value instead.   This might be a better number for value investor comparisons.   My impression of most growth investors is that rather than hoping to make money by having their stock grow into a value stock, they are hoping to make money by buying stocks that stretch out the profile &#8211; i.e. they are looking for a &#8220;margin in safety&#8221; in the number of years of higher growth that are expected going forward.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-16964</link> <dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:45:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2008/02/23/is-the-peg-ratio-a-valid-concept/#comment-16964</guid> <description>You could actually try backtesting the PEG as a trading criterion ....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could actually try backtesting the PEG as a trading criterion &#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
