Redirection of Liquidity, Not Creation of Liquidity

These short-term financing arrangements (TAF & TSLF) are an attempt of the Fed to redirect liquidity from ordinary channels (fed funds and the like), to the short-term funding of banks and dealers with acceptable collateral. Acceptable collateral varies, with differing haircuts depending on the collateral and the financing program. At this point, Agency MBS and AAA whole loans (not on review for downgrade — presumably that means no negative outlooks from any ratings agency) are encouraged.What I find most interesting in all of this how little true liquidity the FOMC has injected in this cycle. The monetary base is flat. What this looks like is an attempt to selectively reflate the economy — help the banks and dealers, but keep total liquidity close to fixed.

And, in the face of this, total bank liabilities keep expanding at a 10%+ clip. It almost feels like any source of liquidity is good liquidity to the banks. Of course, they get a lot of it from the FHLB, which has been the big unconstrained lender in this cycle. Fannie and Freddie may now be able to make larger loans, which loosens up hosing finance a bit, but only the FHLB has the balance sheet to do so in this cycle, and they have done it. Call them the “shadow Fed.” But even their balance sheet is finite, and they are only implicitly backed by the US Government, like Fannie and Freddie.

So where does this leave us? Muddling along. Even the redirection of liquidity will not get the banks and dealers too jazzed, because they are only short term measures, with uncertain long-term funding availability and cost. More attractive than the “free” market for now, but that’s about it.

The Fed is trying some clever ideas. I have just two concerns — what happens when you unwind them, and are they perhaps too clever?  There may be unintended consequences…






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Fed Policy, Macroeconomics, Real Estate and Mortgages | RSS 2.0 |

2 Responses to Redirection of Liquidity, Not Creation of Liquidity

  1. Jeff says:

    David – They are going to keep this facility going as long as necessary. They will increase it if needed. They may actually buy assets.

    This provides an alternative approach to more aggressive rate cuts. They are attempting to stop the death spiral resulting from FAS 157 mark to market prices — a good idea that makes little sense when there is forced selling into illiquid markets.

    What they are doing seems responsive to your past criticisms.

  2. Alan Matthews The Dean of Dracut says:

    This is a wind up that will unwind like a tornado with massive devistation all around. This is not physic class where one can freeze water and then thaw it. We hane had a temporary thaw with the foolish move of lowering the fed rate 75 basis. We are near the end of the rope with little to hold onto. what is the next move? Dollar that 50 cents and a rate of zero????
    How does this redirection help me? My mortage is a 20 year fixed at at 5.25. This does not put any money in my pocket. It does not lower over charged credit card holders with 21% rates. It helps the ultra rich get richer as the government opened up a yield spread. Those hedging on this made huge money today. The government need to shut this all down now!! They need to take direct action not indirect action. Fund Fannie Mae as Jim Crammer wants although I do not agree with him as this is my hard earned moey paid in taxes with my blood and my sweat. Correct the foreclosure situation and let the rest sort itself out. The real issue is loss of homes not loss of finicial institutions. Does anyone care the Bank of New England is gone? No. They were liquidated in the 80′s for foolish loans. The real issue is home loss. MBS need to be fixed and fixed now.

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin