Aleph Blog

 Subscribe in a reader

Disclosure

This blog is produced by David Merkel CFA, a registered representative of Finacorp Securities as an outside business activity. As such, Finacorp Securities does not review or approve materials presented herein. By viewing or participating in discussion on this blog, you understand that the opinions expressed within do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Finacorp Securities, but are the opinions of the author and individual participants. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Before investing, consider your investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Finacorp Securities is a member FINRA and SIPC.

David Merkel

At my blog there are two main purposes: teaching investors about better investing through risk control, and tying all of the markets into a coherent whole.

Latest



Archives


Categories


  • Recent Comments:

    • David Merkel: Dakota — Interested in your view in a detailed way — how did I fail you? What would you...
    • VennData: Manhattan Real Estate has wide bid ask spreads.
    • matt: I can’t wait to read your piece on mutual banks.
    • Dakota: I was very excited when I saw the title of this piece. I was very disheartened after reading the post. When...
    • retail_guy: David- I absolutely love the Bicycle versus Table stability concept. It is elegant in its simplicity.
  • Recent Trackbacks:

  •  Subscribe in a reader

     Subscribe in a reader (comments)

    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Enter your Email


    Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

    Seeking Alpha Certified

    InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

    Blog Directory - Blogged

    IStockAnalyst

    Advertising


    blog advertising is good for you

    Books I Have Reviewed

    Book Reviews

    Other Advertising

     

    Redirection of Liquidity, Not Creation of Liquidity

    These short-term financing arrangements (TAF & TSLF) are an attempt of the Fed to redirect liquidity from ordinary channels (fed funds and the like), to the short-term funding of banks and dealers with acceptable collateral. Acceptable collateral varies, with differing haircuts depending on the collateral and the financing program. At this point, Agency MBS and AAA whole loans (not on review for downgrade — presumably that means no negative outlooks from any ratings agency) are encouraged.What I find most interesting in all of this how little true liquidity the FOMC has injected in this cycle. The monetary base is flat. What this looks like is an attempt to selectively reflate the economy — help the banks and dealers, but keep total liquidity close to fixed.

    And, in the face of this, total bank liabilities keep expanding at a 10%+ clip. It almost feels like any source of liquidity is good liquidity to the banks. Of course, they get a lot of it from the FHLB, which has been the big unconstrained lender in this cycle. Fannie and Freddie may now be able to make larger loans, which loosens up hosing finance a bit, but only the FHLB has the balance sheet to do so in this cycle, and they have done it. Call them the “shadow Fed.” But even their balance sheet is finite, and they are only implicitly backed by the US Government, like Fannie and Freddie.

    So where does this leave us? Muddling along. Even the redirection of liquidity will not get the banks and dealers too jazzed, because they are only short term measures, with uncertain long-term funding availability and cost. More attractive than the “free” market for now, but that’s about it.

    The Fed is trying some clever ideas. I have just two concerns — what happens when you unwind them, and are they perhaps too clever?  There may be unintended consequences…

    2 Responses to “ Redirection of Liquidity, Not Creation of Liquidity ”

    1. Jeff Says:

      David - They are going to keep this facility going as long as necessary. They will increase it if needed. They may actually buy assets.

      This provides an alternative approach to more aggressive rate cuts. They are attempting to stop the death spiral resulting from FAS 157 mark to market prices — a good idea that makes little sense when there is forced selling into illiquid markets.

      What they are doing seems responsive to your past criticisms.

    2. Alan Matthews The Dean of Dracut Says:

      This is a wind up that will unwind like a tornado with massive devistation all around. This is not physic class where one can freeze water and then thaw it. We hane had a temporary thaw with the foolish move of lowering the fed rate 75 basis. We are near the end of the rope with little to hold onto. what is the next move? Dollar that 50 cents and a rate of zero????
      How does this redirection help me? My mortage is a 20 year fixed at at 5.25. This does not put any money in my pocket. It does not lower over charged credit card holders with 21% rates. It helps the ultra rich get richer as the government opened up a yield spread. Those hedging on this made huge money today. The government need to shut this all down now!! They need to take direct action not indirect action. Fund Fannie Mae as Jim Crammer wants although I do not agree with him as this is my hard earned moey paid in taxes with my blood and my sweat. Correct the foreclosure situation and let the rest sort itself out. The real issue is loss of homes not loss of finicial institutions. Does anyone care the Bank of New England is gone? No. They were liquidated in the 80’s for foolish loans. The real issue is home loss. MBS need to be fixed and fixed now.

    Leave a Reply