<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Value of a Balance Sheet</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2008/03/11/the-value-of-a-balance-sheet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/03/11/the-value-of-a-balance-sheet/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: jb</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/03/11/the-value-of-a-balance-sheet/comment-page-1/#comment-17213</link> <dc:creator>jb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:17:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2008/03/11/the-value-of-a-balance-sheet/#comment-17213</guid> <description>I think RWT pulled back hard on repo lines last year, I have to look at the latest Redwood Review again.
I know Novastar almost died in 1998 and they hated repo and went through great lengths through NIMs (re-securitize) to lengthen term.  Oh, well.  If it&#039;s any consolation, David, I probably broke even between capital gains and losses on that company.
This is a grinding affair compared to 1998.  Do you think a Deerfield or a Thornburg would have had their repo lines yanked?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think RWT pulled back hard on repo lines last year, I have to look at the latest Redwood Review again.</p><p>I know Novastar almost died in 1998 and they hated repo and went through great lengths through NIMs (re-securitize) to lengthen term.  Oh, well.  If it&#8217;s any consolation, David, I probably broke even between capital gains and losses on that company.</p><p>This is a grinding affair compared to 1998.  Do you think a Deerfield or a Thornburg would have had their repo lines yanked?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/03/11/the-value-of-a-balance-sheet/comment-page-1/#comment-17210</link> <dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:55:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2008/03/11/the-value-of-a-balance-sheet/#comment-17210</guid> <description>Silly me, I thought the exam process was the mechanism by which the actuarial industry maintained full employment, by limiting supply ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly me, I thought the exam process was the mechanism by which the actuarial industry maintained full employment, by limiting supply &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug M</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/03/11/the-value-of-a-balance-sheet/comment-page-1/#comment-17208</link> <dc:creator>Doug M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:29:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/2008/03/11/the-value-of-a-balance-sheet/#comment-17208</guid> <description>On that note, I think that Redwood Trust will eventually do very well, even if short-term results will be bad.  They didn&#039;t get into the whole repo-financed deals, and had only a modest amount of corporate debt.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On that note, I think that Redwood Trust will eventually do very well, even if short-term results will be bad.  They didn&#8217;t get into the whole repo-financed deals, and had only a modest amount of corporate debt.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
