<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Our Not-So-Elastic Currency</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2008/03/27/our-not-so-elastic-currency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/03/27/our-not-so-elastic-currency/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Josh Stern</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/03/27/our-not-so-elastic-currency/comment-page-1/#comment-17339</link> <dc:creator>Josh Stern</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:39:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=620#comment-17339</guid> <description>&quot;That M2 and other broader monetary aggregates are rising aggressively stems from a willing ness of the banks to take on leverage at present. For banks that are healthy, funds are cheap; they can expand.&quot;
Are you saying that you interpret this statistic to mean that banks, in the aggregate, are healthy?  In other words, there are unhealthy ones but more are increasing lending than decreasing it, so one would expect health rather than disease in a banking aggregate index weighted by balance sheet size.   Is that your view?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That M2 and other broader monetary aggregates are rising aggressively stems from a willing ness of the banks to take on leverage at present. For banks that are healthy, funds are cheap; they can expand.&#8221;</p><p>Are you saying that you interpret this statistic to mean that banks, in the aggregate, are healthy?  In other words, there are unhealthy ones but more are increasing lending than decreasing it, so one would expect health rather than disease in a banking aggregate index weighted by balance sheet size.   Is that your view?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
