David Merkel

At my blog there are two main purposes: teaching investors about better investing through risk control, and tying all of the markets into a coherent whole.

Latest



Archives


Categories


  • Recent Comments:

    • Andy Reyburn: Miller was never a real value investor. Period. His fund was “value” in name only....
    • kyle: Bill Miller’s problem is arrogance — he cannot imagine himself being wrong — he merely...
    • Scott M: …who is MM??
    • sysin3: p.s. If I ever win the lottery, I would want Merkel to manage a good chunk of it. He’s careful,...
    • sysin3: Thanks Paul, I just think that there’s a lot of potAto - potAHto in investing. Goodness knows, I have...
    • Paul in Kansas City: great commentary sysin3
    • sysin3: Bill, I think only value works …. over the long term. It makes no sense to pay too much for a company...
    • GB: I don’t believe in stop losses, but I almost never hang on to something when I’ve taken more than a...
    • TDL: I think the point of the post was that Miller is a good as a value guy, not a growth guy. Not value investing is...
    • Bill aka NO DooDahs!: Because only value works, right?
  • Recent Trackbacks:

  •  Subscribe in a reader

     Subscribe in a reader (comments)

    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Enter your Email


    Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

    Seeking Alpha Certified

    InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

    Blog Directory - Blogged

    Advertising


    blog advertising is good for you

    Books I Have Reviewed

    Book Reviews

    Other Advertising

     

    Two Monetary Policy Graphs for the Evening

    A few notes before I begin this evening. I tried posting twice, but my system failed twice, and the auto-save did not do its job faithfully. So, one reduced post, if I can get it out. Next week, I should publish a small primer on how monetary policy works. Also coming up is my next portfolio reshaping.

    Well, there is certainly no more stigma in borrowing directly from the Fed. Just look at the discount window:

    That’s a new record since the beginning of my data (1980), and more than doubles the last peak in 2001.

    The following graph (look at the lower green graph) is the ratio of my M3 proxy (Total Bank Liabilities) to high-powered money (Total Fed Credit, the Monetary Base).

    This ratio measures the willingness of the Fed to allow the banking system to lever up their deposit base relative to the size of the Fed’s own balance sheet. The data only goes back to 1980, but we are knocking at the door of a new high. The recent move up began in earnest at the beginning of the last tightening cycle, but has persisted into the loosening cycle, as the FOMC has not let the monetary base grow, but has permitted the banks to continue to gather deposits (banking, savings, CDs, money market funds). Some capital requirements have been loosened, and I suspect the bank examiners are not playing hardball at present, at least compared to the attitude 18 months ago.

    After all, the banks don’t have to pay much interest to those who deposit money with them with a curve this low and steep, and many people are afraid of the equity markets, and are letting balances at the banks grow. The banks get cheap funding, and they use it to buy short-duration agency RMBS yielding 3-4%, which is a winner, at least for now.

    3 Responses to “ Two Monetary Policy Graphs for the Evening ”

    1. Bill Says:

      Who wants to buy agencies at 4% when the risk-free rate in structured products is swaps + 500.

    2. David Merkel Says:

      Most banks do. Either for capital reasons, or because the regulators frown on it, they won’t buy seemingly troubled structures, even if they are “risk free.”

    3. Bill Says:

      Yeah, I know they do, worded that post wrong. It is still frustrating to see banks buying the richest MBS in the market for technical reasons.

    Leave a Reply