Archive for April 5th, 2008

Uptight on Uptick

Saturday, April 5th, 2008

There have been many writing about the impact of the lack of an uptick rule in the present market.  In the past, before a player could sell short, the stock had to trade up from the last trade — an uptick.  This made it hard to short a stock too heavily, forcing the price down.

Well, maybe.  I still think shorting is a pretty tough business.  First, the long community is much larger than the short community.  Second, the longs can always move their positions to the cash account if they don’t like other players borrowing their shares.  (Move to the cash account, squeeze the shorts.  Wait.  You don’t want to lose the securities lending income?  Shame on you; you should put client interests first.)

The thing is the uptick rule is not the real problem.  The real problem is that shorts don’t have to get a positive locate at the time of the shorting; a mere indication from the broker enables the short for a few weeks, while search for loanable shares goes on. This is a computerized era.  There is no reason why there can’t be real-time data on loanable shares.

There is a second problem, and less so with stocks, than with other financial instruments that are borrowed.  There needs to be stricter rules/penalties on what happens when a party fails to deliver a security.  As it is, when the cost of failing to deliver is miniscule, it can really bollix up the markets.

The longs have adequate tools to fight the uptick rule; they don’t have adequate tools to help against naked shorting and failures to deliver.

Eleven Notes on our Cantankerous Credit Markets

Saturday, April 5th, 2008

1) Note to small investors seeking income: when someone friendly from Wall Street shows up with an income vehicle, keep your hand on your wallet.  One of the oldest tricks in the game is to offer a high current yield, where the yield can get curtailed through early prepayment (typically in low interest rate environments), or some negative event that forces the security to change its form, such as when a stock price falls with reverse convertibles.  Wall Street only gives you a high yield when they possess an option that you have sold them that enables them to give you the short end of the stick when the markets get ugly.

2) When times get tough, the tough resort to legal action.  Financial Guarantee Insurance contracts are complicated, and the guarantors will do anything they can to wriggle off the hook, particularly when the losses will be stiff.

3)  The loss of confidence in financial guarantors has not changed the operations of many muni bond funds much.  With less trustworthy AAA paper around, many muni managers have decided that holding AA and single-A rated muni bonds isn’t so bad after all.  Less business for the surviving guarantors, it would seem.

4) Jefferson County, Alabama.  Too smart for their own good.   So long as auction rate securities continued to reprice at low rates, they maintained low “fixed” funding costs from their swapped auction rate securities.  But when the auctions failed, the whole thing blew up.  There will probably be a restructuring here, and not a bankruptcy, but this is just another argument for simplicity in investment matters.  Complexity can hide significant problems.

5) Spreads were wide one week ago, even among European government bonds, and last week, as these two posts from Accrued Interest point out,  we had a significant rally in spread terms last week.  Now, credit can be whippy during times of stress, and there are often many false V-like bottoms, before the real bottom arrives.  Be selective in where you lend, and if the sharp rally persists for another few weeks, I would lighten up.  That said, an investor buying and holding would see spreads as attractive here.  When spreads are so far above actuarial default rates, it is usually a good time to buy.  I would not commit my full credit allocation here, but half of full at present.

6)  I don’t fear ratings changes, if that is the only thing going on, and there is no incremental credit degradation, or increased capital requirements.  But many investors don’t think that way, and have investment guidelines that can force sales off of downgrades that are severe enough.  Personally, I think Fitch is best served being as accurate as possible here; they don’t have as large of a base to defend, as do S&P and Moody’s.  So, if downgrades are warranted, do them, and then make the other rating agencies justify their views.

7) I have not been a fan of the ABX indices, and I thought it was good that an ABX index for auto ABS did not come into existence.

8) So what is a auction rate security worth if it is failing?  Par?  I guess it depends on how high the coupon can rise, and the debtor’s ability to pay.  It was quite a statement when UBS began reducing the prices on some auction rate securities.  Personally, I think they did the right thing, but I understand why many were angry.  A complex pseudo-cash security is not the same thing as owning short-term high-quality debt.

9) Then again, there are difficulties for the issuers as well, particularly in student loans.  Not only are costs increased, but it is hard to get new deals done.

10)  GM just can’t seem to shake Delphi.  In an environment like this, where liquidity is scarce, marginal deals blow apart with ease, and even good deals have a difficult time getting done.

11)  Regular readers know that I am not a fan of most complex risk control models that rely on market prices as inputs. My view is that risk managers should examine the likely cash flows from an asset, together with the likelihood of the payoff happening.  With respect to bank risk models, they were too credulous about benefits of diversification, as well as what happens when everyone uses the same model.  Good businessmen of all stripes focus on not losing money on any transaction; every transaction should stand on its own, with diversification as an enhancer in the process.

Dropping Subscriptions

Saturday, April 5th, 2008

When I was younger, twenty years younger, I subscribed to the WSJ, Forbes and Barrons.  Though I am retaining my subscription to the WSJ (my wife wants it for one of my older sons), I am letting my subscriptions to Forbes and Barrons lapse.  What good that they do, I can get online.  (I will probably keep my Barrons Online, but dump WSJ Online.)

I just don’t get enough from Forbes to justify reading it anymore.  Their lists are a convenient way to fill space, and the advertising to articles ratio is high.  I like Barron’s, but I can read it online.  As for the Wall Street Journal Online, it may already be free.

I learned a lot from all of these publications when I was younger, but time is shorter now, and I get more information from online sources at present.

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin