<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Angry Freeholders?</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2008/04/19/angry-freeholders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/04/19/angry-freeholders/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Estragon</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/04/19/angry-freeholders/comment-page-1/#comment-17492</link> <dc:creator>Estragon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:52:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=657#comment-17492</guid> <description>The politics of this strike me as follows:
- Existing freeholders won&#039;t object to the bailout as it will be seen as protecting the equity in their homes.
- Renters won&#039;t object, not only because they tend not to be well organized politically, but also because at a visceral level they think someone else will pay for it.
If either group was really concerned about fiscal distortions related to home finance, why does the mortgage interest deduction still exist?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The politics of this strike me as follows:</p><p>- Existing freeholders won&#8217;t object to the bailout as it will be seen as protecting the equity in their homes.</p><p>- Renters won&#8217;t object, not only because they tend not to be well organized politically, but also because at a visceral level they think someone else will pay for it.</p><p>If either group was really concerned about fiscal distortions related to home finance, why does the mortgage interest deduction still exist?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/04/19/angry-freeholders/comment-page-1/#comment-17486</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:09:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=657#comment-17486</guid> <description>You say &quot;I own my home free and clear...&quot;
In the context of your post I do know what you mean. I&#039;m sure you are aware of the following, but please indulge me:
No-one owns any property free and clear, period.
If you stop paying the fee to live in &quot;your&quot; house (aka property tax) you will no longer be allowed to stay there.
So who really owns the house?
P.S. Nice blog post.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say &#8220;I own my home free and clear&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>In the context of your post I do know what you mean. I&#8217;m sure you are aware of the following, but please indulge me:</p><p>No-one owns any property free and clear, period.</p><p>If you stop paying the fee to live in &#8220;your&#8221; house (aka property tax) you will no longer be allowed to stay there.</p><p>So who really owns the house?</p><p>P.S. Nice blog post.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
