Aleph Blog

 Subscribe in a reader

Disclosure

This blog is produced by David Merkel CFA, a registered representative of Finacorp Securities as an outside business activity. As such, Finacorp Securities does not review or approve materials presented herein. By viewing or participating in discussion on this blog, you understand that the opinions expressed within do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Finacorp Securities, but are the opinions of the author and individual participants. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Before investing, consider your investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Finacorp Securities is a member FINRA and SIPC.

David Merkel

At my blog there are two main purposes: teaching investors about better investing through risk control, and tying all of the markets into a coherent whole.

Latest



Archives


Categories


  • Recent Comments:

    • David Merkel: Stocks are cheap on an earnings relative to BBB corporate bond yields. BBB bonds yield around 6.2%, and...
    • David Merkel: Chris, If you are talking about preferred stock with no maturity, then yes, but many preferred stocks...
    • Dallas: Excellent post. How do you invest in CA$ and AU$ ST bonds funds? They all seem be traded on exchanges US...
    • Chris of Stumptown: Why is preferred stock not ‘true equity’? I don’t understand your point....
    • The Personal Finance Blog: Like Mike C., I’d like to see a little more detail about equities being undervalued....
  • Recent Trackbacks:

  •  Subscribe in a reader

     Subscribe in a reader (comments)

    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Enter your Email


    Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

    Seeking Alpha Certified

    Featured blogger at Wealth Managers League

    Top markets blogs award

    The Aleph Blog

    Top markets blogs

    InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

    Blog Directory - Blogged

    IStockAnalyst

    http://www.wikio.com

    Search

     

    Advertising


    blog advertising is good for you

    Books I Have Reviewed

    Book Reviews

    Other Advertising

    National Atlantic Notes, Part II

    National Atlantic has filed its Preliminary Proxy Statement. I’m only going to tackle one part of it here tonight — the section starting on page 24, “Opinion of the Financial Advisor.” Those who have read me for a long time know that I am neither biased for or against any “fairness opinion.” For those who want to go back to my early days on RealMoney, you can view what I wrote on the MONY acquisition by AXA. The fairness opinion was correct, and the contesting value investors were dead wrong. Part of the problem was not understanding the insurance accounting.

    With National Atlantic, I think the fairness opinion does not truly represent the value of the company. Let me go through a few critical bits of the fairness opinion:

    (Page 26)

         Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis. Banc of America Securities
    reviewed publicly available financial and stock market information for National
    Atlantic and the following seven publicly traded personal lines property and
    casualty insurance companies with a market capitalization below $2.5 billion:
    
            o   Mercury General Corporation
            o   State Auto Financial Corporation
            o   Horace Mann Educators Corporation
            o   Infinity Property & Casualty Corporation
            o   Safety Insurance Group, Inc.
            o   Donegal Group, Inc.
            o   Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc.
    
    Banc of America Securities reviewed, among other things, per share equity
    values, based on closing stock prices on March 7, 2008, of the selected publicly
    traded companies as a multiple of calendar years 2008 and 2009 estimated
    earnings per share, commonly referred to as EPS, and as a multiple of book value
    per share as of December 31, 2007 (in the case of Safety Insurance Group and
    Affirmative Insurance Holdings, as of September 30, 2007).


    Affirmative and Infinity do not belong in this group, because they are both nonstandard auto writers, which get lower valuations than standard writers. Donegal is mainly a commercial writer when last I looked… the rest are fine. I might have included Gainsco, Commerce Group, or Universal Insurance Holdings. In any case, it biases the calculation of the estimated price low.

         Implied Per Share Equity Value Reference Ranges for National Atlantic         Consideration
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------         -------------
    
              2008E EPS                                    2007 Book Value
           ---------------                               -------------------
    
            $3.27 - $4.20                                   $5.24 - $7.85                   $6.25


    It also would have been better to do a scatterplot of Price-to-book versus expected ROE on compared companies. I will have to perform that analysis eventually.


    (Page 27)

            Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis. Banc of America Securities
    reviewed, to the extent publicly available, financial information relating to
    the following twenty selected transactions involving property and casualty
    insurance companies with a transaction value below $500 million:
    
      Announcement
          Date                                    Acquiror                                         Target
    - ---------------       --------------------------------------------------    -----------------------------------------
    
         2/20/08          o    Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.                o   ProCentury Corp.
          1/3/08          o    QBE Insurance Group Ltd.                         o   North Pointe Holdings Corp.
          4/4/07          o    Fortress Investment Group LLC                    o   Alea Group Holdings Ltd.
         3/14/07          o    Argonaut Group, Inc.                             o   PXRE Group Ltd.
         12/4/06          o    Elara Holdings Inc.                              o   Direct General Corp.
         11/22/06         o    Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd.         o   GUARD Financial Group Inc.
         11/13/06         o    Tower Group Inc.                                 o   Preserver Group Inc.
         10/31/06         o    American European Group, Inc.                    o   Merchant's Group Inc.
         10/6/06          o    Affordable Residential Communities Inc.          o   NLASCO, Inc.
         10/3/06          o    Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc.             o   USAgencies, L.L.C.
         9/28/06          o    Arrowpoint Capital Corp.                         o   Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance
         8/16/06          o    QBE Insurance Group Ltd.                         o   One Beacon Insurance Group, Ltd.
          8/4/06          o    Delek Group, Ltd.                                o   Republic Companies Group, Inc.
         7/19/06          o    Inverness Management L.L.C.                      o   Omni Insurance Group Inc.
         11/4/05          o    General Motors Acceptance Corp.                  o   MEEMIC Insurance Company
         5/22/03          o    Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc.              o   Prudential Financial Inc.
         5/22/03          o    The Palisades Group                              o   Prudential Financial Inc.
         3/26/03          o    Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.                  o   Prudential Financial Inc.
         11/1/00          o    American National Insurance Company              o   Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
         10/25/00         o    State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company        o   Meridian Insurance Group, Inc.


    The only deal here that would truly be a “comparable” might be Republic Companies. It was a company that was mainly a personal lines company, unlike many of the rest of these deals which are for commercial insurers and reinsurers (I am not familiar with all of them). Republic was sold significantly over its book value. And, where is Commerce Group? I know it is too big to meet the cutoff, but there is a sale of a single state insurer. I would think that valuation would be relevant.

                     Implied Per Share Equity Value
                  Reference Ranges for National Atlantic            Consideration
                ------------------------------------------        ------------------
                   2008E EPS             2007 Book Value
                ----------------       -------------------
    
                 $5.36 - $6.30             $8.51 - $9.82                $6.25


    So, I think these values are low as well. There is far more certainty to the valuation of the reserves of a short-tailed insurer, which usually deserves a higher valuation.

    (Page 28)

         Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Banc of America Securities performed a
    discounted cash flow analysis of National Atlantic to calculate the estimated
    present value of the standalone unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that
    National Atlantic could generate during National Atlantic's fiscal years 2008
    through 2012 based on the National Atlantic management forecasts. Banc of
    America Securities calculated terminal values for National Atlantic by applying
    terminal forward multiples of 7.0x to 9.0x to National Atlantic's fiscal year
    2013 estimated GAAP earnings and of 0.40x to 0.70x to National Atlantic's
    estimated 2012 year-end book value. The cash flows and terminal values were then
    discounted to present value as of March 7, 2008 using discount rates ranging
    from 15% to 17%. This analysis indicated the following implied per share equity
    value reference ranges for National Atlantic as compared to the Consideration:
    
                 Implied Per Share Equity Value
              Reference Range for National Atlantic             Consideration
         -----------------------------------------------  --------------------------
                           $5.42 - $7.42                            $6.25


    I’d like to see them spill the guts of the calculation, and the other calculations above as well. Using “0.40x to 0.70x to National Atlantic’s estimated 2012 year-end book value” and “discount rates ranging from 15% to 17%” is too severe. This is a company with no debt. It’s marginal cost of capital, using the “pecking order” theory is low. Also, short-tail P&C companies under competent management teams don’t retain valuations below 0.8x book.

         Run-off Analysis. Banc of America Securities also performed a run-off
    analysis of National Atlantic to calculate the net present value of dividends
    that would be paid to shareholders over the remaining life of the company
    assuming that it serviced its existing policies without writing any additional
    policies or renewing any existing policies. Based on the assessment of National
    Atlantic management that the company would not be permitted to pay annual
    dividends by the New Jersey regulators, this analysis calculated the net present
    value of the final dividend available for distribution to shareholders after all
    payouts on loss reserves and losses on unearned premium reserves, estimated to
    be approximately $88.0 million payable in 2016. Banc of America Securities
    applied a sensitivity analysis to assess a range of values if the loss reserves
    were inadequate by up to 10% or were overstated, showing a redundancy of up to
    10%. The range of final dividend distributions were then discounted to present
    value as of March 7, 2008 using discount rates ranging from 13% to 17%. This
    analysis indicated the following implied per share equity value reference ranges
    for National Atlantic as compared to the Consideration:
    
                 Implied Per Share Equity Value
              Reference Range for National Atlantic             Consideration
         -----------------------------------------------  --------------------------
                          $1.36 - $3.60                             $6.25


    Again, the discount rate is too high. Beyond that, they make the fatal assumption that the company can’t close its books until 2016. If National Atlantic stopped writing policies today, then, one year from today, it would receive its last premium. The company would operate with a skeleton staff for one more year, after which, the remaining book could easily be sold to a company specializing in run-offs. You wouldn’t get your money in 2016. It would be more like 2010. Six years of interest discount at 13-17% makes a huge difference in the price.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=–=-==-=–=-==-=-=–=-==–=

    I have more work to do here, but my fundamental view is not changed. I will be voting against the deal, and encouraging others to do the same. Should the deal succeed, I will likely file for appraisal rights. As I have noted before, I believe that I have meritorious arguments for a better price.

    Full disclosure: long NAHC SAFT

    2 Responses to “ National Atlantic Notes, Part II ”

    1. chaka Says:

      The runoff analysis is where I get very frustrated. It clearly does not reflect realistic cash flow timings.

      I’m surely a capitalist but when blantantly biased fairness opinions are essentially used as a safe harbor for shareholder larceny, this is when i get really frustrated with wall street and exec pay. It’s a racket.

    2. The Market Traders Says:

      8 Notes About The Fed…

      David Merkel submits: 1) Let’s start out with my forecast. I’ve given it before, but it has become the conventional wisdom
      — at the next FOMC meeting at the end of April, the Fed will cut by 25
      basis points. They will make the usual noises about bot…

    Leave a Reply