Aleph Blog

 Subscribe in a reader

Disclosure

This blog is produced by David Merkel CFA, a registered representative of Finacorp Securities as an outside business activity. As such, Finacorp Securities does not review or approve materials presented herein. By viewing or participating in discussion on this blog, you understand that the opinions expressed within do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Finacorp Securities, but are the opinions of the author and individual participants. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Before investing, consider your investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Finacorp Securities is a member FINRA and SIPC.

David Merkel

At my blog there are two main purposes: teaching investors about better investing through risk control, and tying all of the markets into a coherent whole.

Latest



Archives


Categories


  • Recent Comments:

    • Chris of Stumptown: Why is preferred stock not ‘true equity’? I don’t understand your point....
    • Jim Fickett: I’m also curious on the equity valuation statement. Australia came through the crisis well, but is...
    • Mike C: Very good and useful post. Nice to get your thoughts on some actionable investment ideas at the asset class...
    • Bob_in_MA: By most valuations, stocks seem to be over-valued. CAPE (10-year P/E) is about 20, in the highest 20% of...
    • maynardGkeynes: @Terry, a problem with munis is the big spreads when you buy or sell. If you use a broker, he’s...
  • Recent Trackbacks:

  •  Subscribe in a reader

     Subscribe in a reader (comments)

    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Enter your Email


    Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

    Seeking Alpha Certified

    Featured blogger at Wealth Managers League

    Top markets blogs award

    The Aleph Blog

    Top markets blogs

    InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

    Blog Directory - Blogged

    IStockAnalyst

    http://www.wikio.com

    Search

     

    Advertising


    blog advertising is good for you

    Books I Have Reviewed

    Book Reviews

    Other Advertising

    The Glass Ceiling Revisited

    After seeing this article from Dealbreaker, I felt that I had to bring out a very old piece of mine.

    In late 1997, Gene Epstein of Barron’s wrote an article called “Low Ceiling.” I wrote a letter to the editor:

    To the Editor
    The “Glass Ceiling” will always exist for women — and men, for that matter — who are principled enough to care for their children. There are jobs that demand so much time that a conscientious parent cannot take them.

    Childrearing is aided by at least one parent sacrificing monetary income for the sake of time to spend with the children. It makes a big difference in quality of life, particularly for the children. The main determinant of a child’s future success is parental input. Without that parental effort, which is economically unprofitable in the short run, the future is not as economically bright, nor as friendly.

    Perhaps it should not surprise us that standard educational achievement scores have dropped as the incidence of two-income families has risen. The pattern goes back for centuries. Wealthy parents get so busy that they cannot raise their children, so they hand the kids off to those who are often far less capable. It is no surprise that their familial wealth rarely lasts past the third generation.

    DAVID J. MERKEL
    Aston, Pennsylvania

    I have worked with many bright, capable women in the workplace, some in the firm that I worked for, and some outside.  Most of them wanted a family and productive work, as I did, which often led to lasting friendships.  But it cuts against advancement in the workplace, which tends to go to men, and the few women who are willing to sacrifice their families for material advancement.

    Women have it worse than dedicated men, because they have to bear the children, and that involves unavoidable pains and delays, and considerably more guilt feelings over whether they are doing it right for their children.  Men in general don’t have those doubts.

    I have turned down jobs that would take me away from my family, and as a result, I am less wealthy.  I don’t care — my wife and kids are happy, in general, and that is what counts.  Though I love writing about economics and finance, I am not a slave to greed, and that enables me to be happier than many in my field.

    We also have to recognize that good men and women are both similar and different.  Similar, in that they care for their families.   Different, in that children require care that differs for each sex.  Fathers can’t nurse, and aren’t as compassionate, on average.  They are also better at dealing with boys as they age.  Women are better with the girls as they age, and better at the early nurture — I changed my share of diapers, but most men are clueless with little kids.

    I leave this possibly controversial piece here — children need care, and parents need to provide it.  That will inhibit your careers, but leave you qualitatively richer in the long run.  I am happy with the sacrifices that I have made for the good of my wife and children.

    4 Responses to “ The Glass Ceiling Revisited ”

    1. PhDmom Says:

      David,
      What an encouraging word and a great reminder of what truly is important. You have made the right choices and will hear on that day… well done!
      Theresa

    2. TDL Says:

      “Wealthy parents get so busy that they cannot raise their children, so they hand the kids off to those who are often far less capable. It is no surprise that their familial wealth rarely lasts past the third generation.”

      That is certainly a different take on the old “shirt sleeves to shirt sleeves in the three generations” saying. Never looked at it that way.

      Regards,
      TDL

    3. Bill aka NO DooDahs! Says:

      Studies that correct for uninterupted time in a career path, and choice of career, typically find that gender-based wage gaps and career ceilings disappear. It’s both cultural and genetic. Women pick different fields and women bear children, which tends to interupt their careers more than it interupts the careers of their sperm doners.

      When industries take 20+ uninterupted years of 50-60 hour weeks to rise to their top, you’ll statistically find a lower percentage of women willing to do what it takes, relative to men. Add the historical (and still existing) bias of women to lower-paid fields, and there you have it.

    4. Bob Kopczeski Says:

      God hates divorce. The Bible is clear about that.
      Our husband or wife is our closest neighbor, and we are to love our neighbor as ourselves.
      Children are a blessing from God. My wife and I were married 14 years before God gave us a daughter. While there’s no guarantee as to how our children will turn out, following God’s rules for discipline is necessary. “While no chastening for the present seems to be joyous, but grievous, nevertheless afterward it yields the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.”

    Leave a Reply