<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Another Look at Preliminary Second Quarter GDP</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-18693</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:35:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=879#comment-18693</guid> <description>Nobody seems to be referencing the blog article that explains it best.  From James Hamilton/Econbrowser:
http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2008/08/what_does_the_g.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody seems to be referencing the blog article that explains it best.  From James Hamilton/Econbrowser:</p><p><a
href="http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2008/08/what_does_the_g.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2008/08/what_does_the_g.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jesse</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-18649</link> <dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:08:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=879#comment-18649</guid> <description>David, your writing about the difference between GD Product and GD Purchases is great. I would suggest a different name for GD Purchases to avoid confusing the capital P in acronyms. If you change it to GD Acqusitions you can start a GDA series and compare it to GDP.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, your writing about the difference between GD Product and GD Purchases is great. I would suggest a different name for GD Purchases to avoid confusing the capital P in acronyms. If you change it to GD Acqusitions you can start a GDA series and compare it to GDP.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-18626</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:17:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=879#comment-18626</guid> <description>Cool, Bill.  I try not to do forecasts of macroeconomic statistics... I&#039;m no good at it.  I will watch and see how it goes... see my note #4 above for what may surprise pundits in 3Q.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, Bill.  I try not to do forecasts of macroeconomic statistics&#8230; I&#8217;m no good at it.  I will watch and see how it goes&#8230; see my note #4 above for what may surprise pundits in 3Q.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-18623</link> <dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:34:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=879#comment-18623</guid> <description>My &quot;Real GDP growth&quot; prediction for calendar year 2008, made on Jan 16 of this year, is +2.6%.  It was made with a simple multivariate regression analysis.
See link:
http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2008/01/gdp-projection-for-2008-and-4q-2007/
David, I trust that early next year, when the number is delivered, you will compile and compare the various predictions from the &quot;blogosphere.&quot;  I spent all of about 30-45 minutes making mine ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My &#8220;Real GDP growth&#8221; prediction for calendar year 2008, made on Jan 16 of this year, is +2.6%.  It was made with a simple multivariate regression analysis.</p><p>See link:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2008/01/gdp-projection-for-2008-and-4q-2007/" rel="nofollow">http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2008/01/gdp-projection-for-2008-and-4q-2007/</a></p><p>David, I trust that early next year, when the number is delivered, you will compile and compare the various predictions from the &#8220;blogosphere.&#8221;  I spent all of about 30-45 minutes making mine &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JKH</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-18607</link> <dc:creator>JKH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:51:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=879#comment-18607</guid> <description>In case you missed, Mark Thoma at Economist&#039;s View also did a nice post on this yesterday. I made a few comments there:
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/09/the-gdp-deflato.html?cid=129030428#comment-129030428</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed, Mark Thoma at Economist&#8217;s View also did a nice post on this yesterday. I made a few comments there:</p><p><a
href="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/09/the-gdp-deflato.html?cid=129030428#comment-129030428" rel="nofollow">http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/09/the-gdp-deflato.html?cid=129030428#comment-129030428</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-18586</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:37:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=879#comment-18586</guid> <description>Barry does read me.  I&#039;ve already commented on his blog, so maybe he has gotten the message.  If not, the next time I see it, I&#039;ll e-mail him... but now, with oil down, the roles of GD Product and GD Purchases should reverse in 3Q -- then it will be interesting to hear the commentary... from both sides, bulls and bears.
And me? I&#039;m not very confident either way about the economy right now.  There are strong and weak parts... and global demand could pull the US either way.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry does read me.  I&#8217;ve already commented on his blog, so maybe he has gotten the message.  If not, the next time I see it, I&#8217;ll e-mail him&#8230; but now, with oil down, the roles of GD Product and GD Purchases should reverse in 3Q &#8212; then it will be interesting to hear the commentary&#8230; from both sides, bulls and bears.</p><p>And me? I&#8217;m not very confident either way about the economy right now.  There are strong and weak parts&#8230; and global demand could pull the US either way.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JKH</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-18585</link> <dc:creator>JKH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:19:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=879#comment-18585</guid> <description>Excellent.
I really wish you and a few of your blogging colleagues who are clear on this issue would do some sort of intervention to help out Big Picture with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent.</p><p>I really wish you and a few of your blogging colleagues who are clear on this issue would do some sort of intervention to help out Big Picture with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-18583</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:40:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=879#comment-18583</guid> <description>Would you believe I saw it 15 minutes after publishing after seeing the link at Alea?  Well, I fleshed it out a little more, and confirmation never hurts.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you believe I saw it 15 minutes after publishing after seeing the link at Alea?  Well, I fleshed it out a little more, and confirmation never hurts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: quick</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/03/another-look-at-preliminary-second-quarter-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-18581</link> <dc:creator>quick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=879#comment-18581</guid> <description>David,
If you haven&#039;t seen it, you might be interested in macroblog&#039;s take on this issue...
http://macroblog.typepad.com/macroblog/2008/09/does-the-gdp-de.html
Cheers,</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br
/> If you haven&#8217;t seen it, you might be interested in macroblog&#8217;s take on this issue&#8230;</p><p><a
href="http://macroblog.typepad.com/macroblog/2008/09/does-the-gdp-de.html" rel="nofollow">http://macroblog.typepad.com/macroblog/2008/09/does-the-gdp-de.html</a></p><p>Cheers,</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
