<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Hodgepodge, Seven Notes</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2008/09/18/hodgepodge-seven-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/18/hodgepodge-seven-notes/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/18/hodgepodge-seven-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-18966</link> <dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:12:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=924#comment-18966</guid> <description>Hi David, thanks for the mention in regards to HYG, but a link to the post sure would have been nice, too ...
http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2008/09/bullish-case-for-junk-bonds/
Would&#039;ve been really nice given that the post make SA.  Would&#039;ve thrown me some traffic and let the readers know who I am.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, thanks for the mention in regards to HYG, but a link to the post sure would have been nice, too &#8230;</p><p><a
href="http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2008/09/bullish-case-for-junk-bonds/" rel="nofollow">http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2008/09/bullish-case-for-junk-bonds/</a></p><p>Would&#8217;ve been really nice given that the post make SA.  Would&#8217;ve thrown me some traffic and let the readers know who I am.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bond newbie</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/18/hodgepodge-seven-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-18832</link> <dc:creator>Bond newbie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:56:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=924#comment-18832</guid> <description>David, any comments on Assurant&#039;s disclosures today? I applaud them for disclosing answers to questions investors would love to hear answered by WFC, C, and other larger firms.
I can&#039;t fault them for owning AIG securities, given the speed of that failure, but holding LEH and FNM/FRE pfds? Do insurance companies even get to categorize GSE pfds as equity capital like banks? If not, why would you hold a noncumulative preferred from a firm who the market predicted would be nationalized since July 4?
Also, when AIZ says that reinsurance will cover claims from Ike at the $95 M limit, does that mean that AIZ likely has $95 M in claims, but anything above that goes to the reinsurer? Should I think of $95M as the &quot;deductible&quot; for the reinsurance policy?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, any comments on Assurant&#8217;s disclosures today? I applaud them for disclosing answers to questions investors would love to hear answered by WFC, C, and other larger firms.</p><p>I can&#8217;t fault them for owning AIG securities, given the speed of that failure, but holding LEH and FNM/FRE pfds? Do insurance companies even get to categorize GSE pfds as equity capital like banks? If not, why would you hold a noncumulative preferred from a firm who the market predicted would be nationalized since July 4?</p><p>Also, when AIZ says that reinsurance will cover claims from Ike at the $95 M limit, does that mean that AIZ likely has $95 M in claims, but anything above that goes to the reinsurer? Should I think of $95M as the &#8220;deductible&#8221; for the reinsurance policy?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bond newbie</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/18/hodgepodge-seven-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-18831</link> <dc:creator>Bond newbie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:51:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=924#comment-18831</guid> <description>David, AIG preferred bear here. Thanks for responding to my question. How do we have any more information than last night? We have Citi predicting a 0% dividend on the common, I dunno about the pfd (not a Citi client, so only saw headline).
Also, the silence from AIG on the EDGAR site is deafening. The excellent NYT Dealbook had a ton of questions about the structure of the deal:
http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/aig-so-many-questions/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, AIG preferred bear here. Thanks for responding to my question. How do we have any more information than last night? We have Citi predicting a 0% dividend on the common, I dunno about the pfd (not a Citi client, so only saw headline).</p><p>Also, the silence from AIG on the EDGAR site is deafening. The excellent NYT Dealbook had a ton of questions about the structure of the deal:</p><p><a
href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/aig-so-many-questions/" rel="nofollow">http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/aig-so-many-questions/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IMHO</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/09/18/hodgepodge-seven-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-18830</link> <dc:creator>IMHO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:02:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=924#comment-18830</guid> <description>Off-topic question.  David, as you were part of the insurance industry, could you in the future comment on how the insurance industry satisfies claims after a major claim event?
I ask because I&#039;m wondering to what extent &quot;forced selling&quot; by insurance companies due to Hurricane &quot;???? whatever-his name&quot; to settle claims was another straw on the camels back to the liquidation caused by LEH, CDS collateral calls, credit ratings downgrade calls, etc.
Naturally it&#039;s impossible to &#039;prove&#039; that the hurricane exacerbated the selling in equities and corporate bonds but looking back on the charts, there seems to be a correlation with the few expensive hurricanes and negative/zero returns in the SPX.  Just something to keep in mind for the future.
Cheers.
PS and yes, LQD/corporate bonds still looks to good to be true.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off-topic question.  David, as you were part of the insurance industry, could you in the future comment on how the insurance industry satisfies claims after a major claim event?</p><p>I ask because I&#8217;m wondering to what extent &#8220;forced selling&#8221; by insurance companies due to Hurricane &#8220;???? whatever-his name&#8221; to settle claims was another straw on the camels back to the liquidation caused by LEH, CDS collateral calls, credit ratings downgrade calls, etc.</p><p>Naturally it&#8217;s impossible to &#8216;prove&#8217; that the hurricane exacerbated the selling in equities and corporate bonds but looking back on the charts, there seems to be a correlation with the few expensive hurricanes and negative/zero returns in the SPX.  Just something to keep in mind for the future.</p><p>Cheers.</p><p>PS and yes, LQD/corporate bonds still looks to good to be true.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
