<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IFRS: Incomparable Flexible Reporting Standards.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2008/10/11/ifrs-incomparable-flexible-reporting-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alephblog.com/2008/10/11/ifrs-incomparable-flexible-reporting-standards/</link>
	<description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:50:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Merkel</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2008/10/11/ifrs-incomparable-flexible-reporting-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-19988</link>
		<dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1024#comment-19988</guid>
		<description>Darla -- you have me on fair value; as I have written elsewhere, fair value is not a major cause of the credit crisis, though many auditors misapply SFAS 157.

But the benefits of standardizing accounting across borders are overstated.  Perhaps the train cannot be stopped; perhaps it can.  As we are finding now, many things that people relied upon are failing... there is no telling what a new administration might do.  Chris Cox went for IFRS out of weakness and pressure from Wall Street.  The new SEC chair will represent an administration with a more internationalist point of view, but who can tell?  Skepticism over accounting rules may lead to some surprises.

I suspect we end up with IFRS, but after more negotiations that brings some aspects closer to GAAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darla &#8212; you have me on fair value; as I have written elsewhere, fair value is not a major cause of the credit crisis, though many auditors misapply SFAS 157.</p>
<p>But the benefits of standardizing accounting across borders are overstated.  Perhaps the train cannot be stopped; perhaps it can.  As we are finding now, many things that people relied upon are failing&#8230; there is no telling what a new administration might do.  Chris Cox went for IFRS out of weakness and pressure from Wall Street.  The new SEC chair will represent an administration with a more internationalist point of view, but who can tell?  Skepticism over accounting rules may lead to some surprises.</p>
<p>I suspect we end up with IFRS, but after more negotiations that brings some aspects closer to GAAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darla Sycamore</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2008/10/11/ifrs-incomparable-flexible-reporting-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-19987</link>
		<dc:creator>Darla Sycamore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1024#comment-19987</guid>
		<description>You make some valid points. Yes the adoption of IFRS has been a hodge podge and there is yet no comparability.The details in US GAAP I believe lead to a rule book mentality.US GAAP did not prevent Enron or the credit crisis. If anything a lot of effort goes into designing transactions to satisfy detail accounting rules - in my view it is the substance of a transaction that counts not its form.Unfortunately one cannot legislate ethics.
The credit crisis has pointed to the need for international solutions.The IASB has shown itself to be a leader in the fair value debate. I see signs in the US of yielding to government pressure. This has been a characteristic in the USA - witness Sarbanes Oxley. Dropping fair value measurements as a quick fix does not work for me.
I respectfully suggest as a Canadian, born in the UK, that the USA needs to be part of the international community - isolationism does not work.
The US should join in and make IFRS work. In any event the FASB and the IASB are working toward convergence. You cannot stop the train.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some valid points. Yes the adoption of IFRS has been a hodge podge and there is yet no comparability.The details in US GAAP I believe lead to a rule book mentality.US GAAP did not prevent Enron or the credit crisis. If anything a lot of effort goes into designing transactions to satisfy detail accounting rules &#8211; in my view it is the substance of a transaction that counts not its form.Unfortunately one cannot legislate ethics.<br />
The credit crisis has pointed to the need for international solutions.The IASB has shown itself to be a leader in the fair value debate. I see signs in the US of yielding to government pressure. This has been a characteristic in the USA &#8211; witness Sarbanes Oxley. Dropping fair value measurements as a quick fix does not work for me.<br />
I respectfully suggest as a Canadian, born in the UK, that the USA needs to be part of the international community &#8211; isolationism does not work.<br />
The US should join in and make IFRS work. In any event the FASB and the IASB are working toward convergence. You cannot stop the train.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Powers</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2008/10/11/ifrs-incomparable-flexible-reporting-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-19342</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1024#comment-19342</guid>
		<description>At last check, the CFA Institute supported the move to IFRS.  As you carry the CFA designation, I am curious if you have any comment on the CFAI&#039;s opinion?  

Disclosure:  I am currently a candidate for the CFA designation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last check, the CFA Institute supported the move to IFRS.  As you carry the CFA designation, I am curious if you have any comment on the CFAI&#8217;s opinion?  </p>
<p>Disclosure:  I am currently a candidate for the CFA designation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
