Aleph Blog

 Subscribe in a reader

Disclosure

This blog is produced by David Merkel CFA, a registered representative of Finacorp Securities as an outside business activity. As such, Finacorp Securities does not review or approve materials presented herein. By viewing or participating in discussion on this blog, you understand that the opinions expressed within do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Finacorp Securities, but are the opinions of the author and individual participants. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Before investing, consider your investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Finacorp Securities is a member FINRA and SIPC.

David Merkel

At my blog there are two main purposes: teaching investors about better investing through risk control, and tying all of the markets into a coherent whole.

Latest



Archives


Categories


  • Recent Comments:

    • IF: I’ve noticed (and this is currently commented on with regards to the GS/Greece story), that US investors...
    • David Merkel: IF, you are right, I forgot.
    • James Dailey: Hello David, I hope you take my comments in the spirit in which it is intended – constructive...
    • IF: David, I am very surprised you mention FXC and FXA after writing this last year: http://alephblog.com/2009/0...
    • Terry: @maynardGkeynes–I am able to track my muni bond’s value on a close to current basis. The prices I...
  • Recent Trackbacks:

  •  Subscribe in a reader

     Subscribe in a reader (comments)

    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Enter your Email


    Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

    Seeking Alpha Certified

    Featured blogger at Wealth Managers League

    Top markets blogs award

    The Aleph Blog

    Top markets blogs

    InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

    Blog Directory - Blogged

    IStockAnalyst

    http://www.wikio.com

    Search

     

    Advertising


    blog advertising is good for you

    Books I Have Reviewed

    Book Reviews

    Other Advertising

    The Fed Funds Target Rate is an Exercise in Futility

    I spend time watching the Fed.  Much of that time is wasted, but they are an important cog in the machine that is our economy.  Today, around 2:15 when the Fed’s policy statement is released, and the guy on CNBC at the Fed talks into the mike that sounds like it is a coffee can, many will focus on the change in the Fed funds target rate.  I am here to say that given the changes that have happened in our economy, and the new ways that the Fed conducts its policies, the Fed funds target rate is not all that relevant.  Why?

    • The Fed does most of its direction of incremental liquidity through special programs like the TAF, TSLF, PDCF, ABCPMM, rescues, etc.  It doesn’t send most of the liquidity out through the banks, and perhaps into the economy more generally (if the banks would lend).
    • The Fed is having a hard time targeting Fed funds in an era where they can pay interest on excess reserves.  Effective fed funds has been averaging 0.75% over the past 10 days.
    • The closer we get to the zero bound, the less punch the Fed has through ordinary monetary policy.  Expectations of policy failure swamp the cash flows involved, at least for a while.
    • Real short-term lending rates are at present not connected to Fed funds.  That includes semi-real rates like LIBOR, and somewhat more real rates like A1/P1 commercial paper, and real short term rates like A2/P2 CP, where only the free market is lending, and the Fed is not.

    If the Fed funds target falls to 1%, and commentators trot out Greenspan’s name, remember this: the two situations are not the same.  In 2003, the banks were healthy, and there were still areas of the economy that could benefit from lower rates and lever up, thus boosting GDP and markets.  We got a housing bubble amid other consumer finance bubbles, and probably a bubble in commercial real estate as well.  All of that added up to a bubble in companies that did lending.

    A 1% Fed funds target will not have any punch this time around.  Even 0% with “quantitative easing” a la Japan will lead to Japanese-style results, though again, only favored markets get the liquidity.

    So, don’t expect much out of the rate.  Read the announcement for what little qualitative information it might yield.  I’ll be back with a compared version of the last and current statements later today.

    Leave a Reply