The Aleph Blog » Blog Archive » Financial Dominoes

Financial Dominoes

Capital structure is relevant.  Promises are significant.  Contracts are definitive.

This will be short (it better be, I’m tired and want to sleep), but I have no end of friends asking me how bad it is out there.  First I tell them my opinion is a minority opinion.  Second, I tell them that debt-laden economies are inherently inflexible.  Third, I tell them that when the banks are compromised, ordinary monetary policy is useless, because there is no way to make a bank that is worried about its solvency lend more.  Fourth, even extraordinary monetary policy may not work, as the Fed tries to target lending markets, and finds that they can absorb bad assets, but can’t readily recycle them.

The aggregate capital structure of the economy is not a matter of indifference.  If there are many debt claims, and firms with debt finance other firms via debt, who finance other firms via debt, etc., then we set up a bunch of financial dominoes, where a disturbance can knock one down and carry others with it.

This is why the total debt to GDP ratio matters so much.  Economies stop functioning when they have high levels of embedded debt and a slowdown hits.  That is where we are now, at levels of Debt to GDP that exceed those of the Great Depression.  Until we get that ratio down from 350% down to 150%, normalcy will not return.  Air is leaking out of the debt bubble, and the ability to reflate is not there, because the market value of the assets have sagged to such a level that even a zero Fed funds rate will not raise the market value to the levels where the assets are booked.

People are not reliable; they sin; they default.  Economic systems that are primarily equity financed are better able to deal with the nature of man, because they have more flexibility.  Economic systems that are more heavily debt financed face more problems when someone cannot live up to his promises, because it means that others relying on the performance may not be able to live up to their promises also.

Things are different now.  In past economic cycles, there were sectors of the economy that could be stimulated by the Fed lowering the Fed funds rate.  But now, because of too many fixed committments, there is no sector of the American economy that can absorb more debt, and stimulate everyone else.

Thus the task of levering up falls to the Federal government.  But will they be able to honor all the promises that they have made?  Given that they control the printing press, the answer is yes in nominal terms, but no if in inflation-adjusted terms.






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Macroeconomics, Structured Products and Derivatives | RSS 2.0 |

4 Responses to Financial Dominoes

  1. BarryB says:

    Thank you for all of your informative posts. I’m a regular reader and I always learn something when reading your blog (although most of it goes over my head).

    I think alot of amatuers like myself who have managed to move some of our retirement money into short term treasuries know that the money cannot stay there forever at < 1% yields.

    Do you see corporate bonds as a “trade” or a longer term investment? Do you see future inflationary pressure as something that would then cause a trade out of those same bonds down the road? Thanks for your insight.

  2. Rusty says:

    David,
    How will the debt / GDP ratio normalize?
    Seems like debt will decrease rapidly only via default.
    Seems like GDP is likely to only shrink.

    Absent some pro-growth policy suggestion like lower taxes or regulation (which no one is promoting), we left with only a bad outcome?

    Rusty

  3. matt says:

    Mr. Merkel:

    I was just reading about capital structures in my corporate finance book and noted that for tax reasons, the marginal cost of capital actually decreases as companies add financial leverage up to a point of some optimal capital structure (effectively, capitalizing a company with debt increases its value to a certain point).

    It seems like government policies such as this actually encourage unstable balance sheets. I think that you have mentioned in the past how the ability to write off mortgage interest on personal taxes encouraged people to borrow money to buy homes in a speculative market.

    In fact, the more I look, the more it seems to me that a large portion of government policy enacted over the past 30 years encourages debt financing by businesses and people. The banks must be incredible lobbyists.

    It seems like eliminating the tax advantage of debt financing could foment a more stable financial system.

  4. Bailouts Must Be Odious…

    David Merkel submits: There has been a significant shift in bailout psychology over the last week or two.  The grand shift has been to make the cost of receiving money from the U.S .government smaller, which gets “banks” to line up for…

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin