Aleph Blog

 Subscribe in a reader

Disclosure

This blog is produced by David Merkel CFA, a registered representative of Finacorp Securities as an outside business activity. As such, Finacorp Securities does not review or approve materials presented herein. By viewing or participating in discussion on this blog, you understand that the opinions expressed within do not reflect the opinions or recommendations of Finacorp Securities, but are the opinions of the author and individual participants. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Before investing, consider your investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Any purchase or sale activity in any securities instrument should be based upon your own analysis and conclusions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Finacorp Securities is a member FINRA and SIPC.

David Merkel

At my blog there are two main purposes: teaching investors about better investing through risk control, and tying all of the markets into a coherent whole.

Latest



Archives


Categories


  • Recent Comments:

    • dlr: One thing I haven’t heard discussed much but that seems to add lots of risk to the system is allowing...
    • Jem: No rules will help unless we can depend on the regulatory system to hold banks to them. I’d like to see a...
    • Guillermo Roditi: OK, so am I the only one that thinks transaction taxes are ridiculous? It seems to me like they...
    • brad greenspan: very well put, david
    • najdorf: This is perhaps more of a comment on your #3, but large corporations imitate governments in this respect...
  • Recent Trackbacks:

  •  Subscribe in a reader

     Subscribe in a reader (comments)

    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Enter your Email


    Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

    Seeking Alpha Certified

    Featured blogger at Wealth Managers League

    Top markets blogs award

    The Aleph Blog

    Top markets blogs

    InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

    Blog Directory - Blogged

    IStockAnalyst

    http://www.wikio.com

    No Advertising

    No Advertising on Sundays. Enjoy the white space.

    Momentum in the S&P 500

    Time for another break from “All crisis, all of the time.”  I have long been fascinated by momentum anomalies, and this is an initial attempt to under stand them better.  My contentions have been that:

    • Sharp moves mean-revert, gradual moves persist.
    • In the short-run momentum persists, in the intermediate-term, it mean-reverts, and in the long-run, oddly, it persists.

    Let’s see how well my default views stack up against the evidence.  I used Professor Shiller’s augmented S&P 500 data from 1871 to mid-2008 to ask the following question: given the performance of the last year and the last month, what can that tell us about the likely returns for the next year and next month?

    I divided performance into ten deciles for the past year and the past month.  Here are the monthly and annual returns by decile:

    For purposes of completeness, I also calculated the number of observations by decile:

    Note the correlation.  The main diagonal elements support the idea that monthly and yearly returns are correlated.  Not too surprising.

    Returns Over the Next Year

    So, how do returns over the next year relate to returns over the last month and year?

    Okay, the R-squared is low on this calculation, but the drift from the regression is that there is mean reversion from the past year’s return, and momentum from the monthly returns.  Oddly, some of the worst return occurred when yearly returns were pretty average.

    Returns Over the Next Month

    So, how do returns over the next month relate to returns over the last month and year?

    The R-squared is a little better here, and the main result is that the past year’s returns do not impact the next month’s returns much, but the past month’s returns do.  There may be some evidence for when monthly momentum is strong, if annual momentum is strongly positive or negative, there will be outperformance.

    So, what do I conclude here?

    • Monthly momentum persists over the next month and year.
    • Annual momentum might persist over the next month, and with a lesser tendency might revert over the next year.

    One constant I have observed in financial economics: mean-reversion exists, but the tendency is weak.

    PS — where are we now?  Lowest deciles for both monthly and annual returns, which indicates bad performance for the next month , but good performance for the next year.  Buckle in, it will be volatile.

    3 Responses to “ Momentum in the S&P 500 ”

    1. matt_swansojeiker Says:

      Thanks, David. Very good food for thought.

      What could happen in the next year if we see a dramatic reversal in the flight-to-quality / liquidity trade currently on? In the event of a dollar collapse, might the nominal return on the S&P be positive y-o-y but the real return something altogether worse?

      The image in my head right now is one of obese bankers frantically piling one on top of the other into a safe house named “treasuries” only to have the floor collapse beneath them due to sheer weight…..

    2. Markus Says:

      Hello David,
      there is a lot of literature out there that supports your theory regarding momentum strategies applied to stock and commodity markets, e.g.Jagadeesh/Titman http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=299107.
      We simulated a momentum strategy on S&P500 stocks that did exceptionally well since 1991 and outperformed the S&P by sharp ratio, MDD and returns but nevertheless had by far its worst drawdown in the last three months.

    3. Independent Says:

      David, I did something similar several years ago with individual stocks from the Telechart universe of about 7000 stocks, and found that BOTH the largest future gains and losses were in the most extreme deciles—10% and 90%. In other words, the largest historical gainers had many large future winners and many large future losers at the same time, as did the worst historical losers. This is consistent with both the momentum and turnaround strategies.

      You might throw in an interaction into the analysis since the effect of one variable seems to be different across levels of the other variable. You can do so by creating an interaction variable equal to the product of the historical yearly return X monthly return.

    Leave a Reply