<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Book Review:Beat the Market: Invest by Knowing What Stocks to Buy and What Stocks to Sell</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2008/12/13/book-reviewbeat-the-market-invest-by-knowing-what-stocks-to-buy-and-what-stocks-to-sell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/12/13/book-reviewbeat-the-market-invest-by-knowing-what-stocks-to-buy-and-what-stocks-to-sell/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:14:22 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Kurt Osis</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2008/12/13/book-reviewbeat-the-market-invest-by-knowing-what-stocks-to-buy-and-what-stocks-to-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-20387</link> <dc:creator>Kurt Osis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:05:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1246#comment-20387</guid> <description>David:
How can advocate people using these models which clearly don&#039;t work?  Estimating volatility is a suckers bet.  Even if you could estimate the underlying &quot;actual&quot; volatility with 100% accuracy there would be sample error in your realized volatility. And of course the volatility isn&#039;t just changing, the fundamentals of the underlying are changing.
I once heard of a man named Mandelbrot who said volatility was infinite, in which case these sigmas and lemmas are a bit beside the point, no?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David:</p><p>How can advocate people using these models which clearly don&#8217;t work?  Estimating volatility is a suckers bet.  Even if you could estimate the underlying &#8220;actual&#8221; volatility with 100% accuracy there would be sample error in your realized volatility. And of course the volatility isn&#8217;t just changing, the fundamentals of the underlying are changing.</p><p>I once heard of a man named Mandelbrot who said volatility was infinite, in which case these sigmas and lemmas are a bit beside the point, no?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
