<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Unstable Value Funds? (II)</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/01/09/unstable-value-funds-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/01/09/unstable-value-funds-ii/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/01/09/unstable-value-funds-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-20822</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:46:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1314#comment-20822</guid> <description>Bond Newbie -- I called it &quot;a first crack in the foundation for stable value funds.&quot;  Nothing more.
The stable value funds are loaded with AAA-rated paper, much of which is trading significantly below par at present.  If redemptions at par became significant, many stable value funds would fail.
I&#039;ve worked in the business, and think I know it pretty well.  I&#039;ve run the stress test scenarios for SV pools, and I know what can break them.  A lot of those factors are on the table now, including the possibility of more wrappers failing, which, though ugly-sounding, is the least of the worries here.
I thought I wrote something fairly balanced here.  I recognized what would take worse losses -- not the stable value funds.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bond Newbie &#8212; I called it &#8220;a first crack in the foundation for stable value funds.&#8221;  Nothing more.</p><p>The stable value funds are loaded with AAA-rated paper, much of which is trading significantly below par at present.  If redemptions at par became significant, many stable value funds would fail.</p><p>I&#8217;ve worked in the business, and think I know it pretty well.  I&#8217;ve run the stress test scenarios for SV pools, and I know what can break them.  A lot of those factors are on the table now, including the possibility of more wrappers failing, which, though ugly-sounding, is the least of the worries here.</p><p>I thought I wrote something fairly balanced here.  I recognized what would take worse losses &#8212; not the stable value funds.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bond newbie</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/01/09/unstable-value-funds-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-20820</link> <dc:creator>Bond newbie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:12:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1314#comment-20820</guid> <description>David, you&#039;re kind of off-base in fearmongering here. Read the WSJ article again, esp. the last paragraph, and the Bloomberg version of same events. ONLY LEHMAN EMPLOYEES ARE TAKING LOSSES -- participants at other firms that use Invesco Stable Value funds are fine. This is a tempest in a teapot, and no different than &quot;Wah, wah, I had all my 401(k) money in Enron/ Worldcom/ HealthSouth/ Lehman stock and now I&#039;m ruined.&quot; If you invest in an employer-sponsored savings plan, don&#039;t be surprised if it&#039;s in trouble should your employer get into distress.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, you&#8217;re kind of off-base in fearmongering here. Read the WSJ article again, esp. the last paragraph, and the Bloomberg version of same events. ONLY LEHMAN EMPLOYEES ARE TAKING LOSSES &#8212; participants at other firms that use Invesco Stable Value funds are fine. This is a tempest in a teapot, and no different than &#8220;Wah, wah, I had all my 401(k) money in Enron/ Worldcom/ HealthSouth/ Lehman stock and now I&#8217;m ruined.&#8221; If you invest in an employer-sponsored savings plan, don&#8217;t be surprised if it&#8217;s in trouble should your employer get into distress.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anderson</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/01/09/unstable-value-funds-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-20685</link> <dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:42:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1314#comment-20685</guid> <description>A definite area of concern.  However, pressuring your DC Plan provider will do very little.  These are not mutual funds.  They were until a disclosure and pricing rule forced them to all move back to commingled fund structure.  Their reporting guidelines are ridiculous but followed scrupulously by the managers.  I&#039;ve found it impossible to get any useful information from any Stable Value fund managers despite many attempts.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A definite area of concern.  However, pressuring your DC Plan provider will do very little.  These are not mutual funds.  They were until a disclosure and pricing rule forced them to all move back to commingled fund structure.  Their reporting guidelines are ridiculous but followed scrupulously by the managers.  I&#8217;ve found it impossible to get any useful information from any Stable Value fund managers despite many attempts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
