<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Trash the Transfer Tax!</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/02/20/trash-the-transfer-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/02/20/trash-the-transfer-tax/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/02/20/trash-the-transfer-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-21040</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:23:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1461#comment-21040</guid> <description>Well then, I gave you a great number of logical arguments.  Why aren&#039;t they compelling to you?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then, I gave you a great number of logical arguments.  Why aren&#8217;t they compelling to you?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: polit2k</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/02/20/trash-the-transfer-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-21039</link> <dc:creator>polit2k</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1461#comment-21039</guid> <description>I&#039;ve yet to hear a good logical argument against this proposed tax except it&#039;s billing as &quot;Let Wall Street Pay for Wall Street’s Bailout Act of 2009&quot; which is a stupid way of selling the concept.
Governments ww need tax revenues and they&#039;ll get them wherever they can.  This looks like an easy sell and very cheap to collect and don&#039;t assume it won&#039;t end up much higher than 0.25%.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve yet to hear a good logical argument against this proposed tax except it&#8217;s billing as &#8220;Let Wall Street Pay for Wall Street’s Bailout Act of 2009&#8243; which is a stupid way of selling the concept.</p><p>Governments ww need tax revenues and they&#8217;ll get them wherever they can.  This looks like an easy sell and very cheap to collect and don&#8217;t assume it won&#8217;t end up much higher than 0.25%.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: matt</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/02/20/trash-the-transfer-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-21016</link> <dc:creator>matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:48:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1461#comment-21016</guid> <description>One of the reasons the U.S. capital markets haven&#039;t taken as much of a beating as the ROTW (rest of the world) is because of their liquidity. In crisis times, liquidity is just one more safety buffer.
Laws like this do a lot of bad things, but exporting liquidity to other capital markets with the capacity to handle it is a major result.
Additionally, this will make markets less efficient because there will be a larger arbitrage barrier.
Finally, more volatility. yup.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons the U.S. capital markets haven&#8217;t taken as much of a beating as the ROTW (rest of the world) is because of their liquidity. In crisis times, liquidity is just one more safety buffer.</p><p>Laws like this do a lot of bad things, but exporting liquidity to other capital markets with the capacity to handle it is a major result.</p><p>Additionally, this will make markets less efficient because there will be a larger arbitrage barrier.</p><p>Finally, more volatility. yup.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kieran</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/02/20/trash-the-transfer-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-21005</link> <dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:43:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1461#comment-21005</guid> <description>With the number of worldwide exchanges and ability of money to flow easily from one to the next, this would be a disastrous law to pass.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the number of worldwide exchanges and ability of money to flow easily from one to the next, this would be a disastrous law to pass.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: KevinMorrow</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/02/20/trash-the-transfer-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-21001</link> <dc:creator>KevinMorrow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:15:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1461#comment-21001</guid> <description>Just curious, but would the passage of such legislation move the bond markets out of the US to avoid the taxation? Thus creating more liquidity outside the US. And if so, how would that impact the Treasury market? Would the tax apply to Treasury trades as well? If so, yikes!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, but would the passage of such legislation move the bond markets out of the US to avoid the taxation? Thus creating more liquidity outside the US. And if so, how would that impact the Treasury market? Would the tax apply to Treasury trades as well? If so, yikes!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
