<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Book Review: Trend Following (2)</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/04/25/book-review-trend-following-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/04/25/book-review-trend-following-2/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Terry</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/04/25/book-review-trend-following-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21630</link> <dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:49:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1616#comment-21630</guid> <description>&quot;It is times like these that try men&#039;s souls.&quot;
Don&#039;t recall who said that, but it seems to be so true.  Trend following/momentum investing, like so many other favored theories of investing (diversification--&quot;It works until it doesn&#039;t.&quot;), is being found inadequate to cope with a &quot;fat tail&quot; economic and market scenario.
To me, it just points to the extreme difficulty of seeing around the corner of major economic or market trends.  If a trend is established, it is easy to follow that trend (like $145/bbl oil going to a projected $200/bbl as GS projected), but it is virtually impossible to see the forces that will undercut the trend, no matter how sophisticated the modeling.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is times like these that try men&#8217;s souls.&#8221;</p><p>Don&#8217;t recall who said that, but it seems to be so true.  Trend following/momentum investing, like so many other favored theories of investing (diversification&#8211;&#8221;It works until it doesn&#8217;t.&#8221;), is being found inadequate to cope with a &#8220;fat tail&#8221; economic and market scenario.</p><p>To me, it just points to the extreme difficulty of seeing around the corner of major economic or market trends.  If a trend is established, it is easy to follow that trend (like $145/bbl oil going to a projected $200/bbl as GS projected), but it is virtually impossible to see the forces that will undercut the trend, no matter how sophisticated the modeling.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul in Kansas City</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/04/25/book-review-trend-following-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21620</link> <dc:creator>Paul in Kansas City</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:34:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1616#comment-21620</guid> <description>Cramer is a successful manager and a pretty good guy in person; we can all learn from any successful individuals&#039; methods.  Disagreement doesn&#039;t have to be so personal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cramer is a successful manager and a pretty good guy in person; we can all learn from any successful individuals&#8217; methods.  Disagreement doesn&#8217;t have to be so personal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay Weinstein</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/04/25/book-review-trend-following-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21612</link> <dc:creator>Jay Weinstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:16:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1616#comment-21612</guid> <description>David&#039;s work is essentially the anti-Cramer, which makes this really bizarre.
As a big fan of David, frankly the only thing I don&#039;t like about him is his occasional nice comment about Cramer!!  David is just much nicer than I am.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David&#8217;s work is essentially the anti-Cramer, which makes this really bizarre.</p><p>As a big fan of David, frankly the only thing I don&#8217;t like about him is his occasional nice comment about Cramer!!  David is just much nicer than I am.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: synchro</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/04/25/book-review-trend-following-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21610</link> <dc:creator>synchro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:40:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1616#comment-21610</guid> <description>And this is why I found the likes of Jim Cramer and Michael Covel equally distasteful:  they mislead into the public into thinking that just because _some_ people like trend followers or value investors are successful at it, then they too, could copy their methodology and make a go at it.  That is just not true.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is why I found the likes of Jim Cramer and Michael Covel equally distasteful:  they mislead into the public into thinking that just because _some_ people like trend followers or value investors are successful at it, then they too, could copy their methodology and make a go at it.  That is just not true.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: synchro</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/04/25/book-review-trend-following-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21609</link> <dc:creator>synchro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:36:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1616#comment-21609</guid> <description>David, I applaud your original review of Covel&#039;s book.  I further applaud the way you _responded_ to his way of reacting.  You are the one that is the consumate professional.
Having researched and learned about the many ways of investing and speculating, the conclusion I come to is that most people should not even attempt it.  This has nothing to do with _methodologies_.  It is just that most people simply do not have the temperament and psychology to follow _any_ investment/speculating methodology patiently and persistently.  The majority is simply better off saving 6% of their income in a FDIC bank savings account and let compound interest do its work for them slowly.  Forget equities and bond mutual funds.  Forget stocks.  Most of all, forget about finding the holy grail to getting rich through investing and/or speculating.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I applaud your original review of Covel&#8217;s book.  I further applaud the way you _responded_ to his way of reacting.  You are the one that is the consumate professional.</p><p>Having researched and learned about the many ways of investing and speculating, the conclusion I come to is that most people should not even attempt it.  This has nothing to do with _methodologies_.  It is just that most people simply do not have the temperament and psychology to follow _any_ investment/speculating methodology patiently and persistently.  The majority is simply better off saving 6% of their income in a FDIC bank savings account and let compound interest do its work for them slowly.  Forget equities and bond mutual funds.  Forget stocks.  Most of all, forget about finding the holy grail to getting rich through investing and/or speculating.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PaulinKansasCity</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/04/25/book-review-trend-following-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21605</link> <dc:creator>PaulinKansasCity</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:17:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1616#comment-21605</guid> <description>Comparing you to Jim C. is ridiculous. It really is too bad (but it is instructive regarding human logic) that writing opinions regarding the stock market on a website affiliated with Cramer makes you some sort of robot.  And writers are almost required to write or say things to show independence. I&#039;m going to throw a shout out to Jeff Miller&#039;s blog &quot;A Dash of Insight&quot;(linked here) as he spends a lot of time writing on logical thinking.  Any reader that has READ both your&#039;s and Cramer&#039;s columns and views you as a Cramer trainee needs to seriously think about how they evaluate information to form an opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing you to Jim C. is ridiculous. It really is too bad (but it is instructive regarding human logic) that writing opinions regarding the stock market on a website affiliated with Cramer makes you some sort of robot.  And writers are almost required to write or say things to show independence. I&#8217;m going to throw a shout out to Jeff Miller&#8217;s blog &#8220;A Dash of Insight&#8221;(linked here) as he spends a lot of time writing on logical thinking.  Any reader that has READ both your&#8217;s and Cramer&#8217;s columns and views you as a Cramer trainee needs to seriously think about how they evaluate information to form an opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/04/25/book-review-trend-following-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21603</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:14:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1616#comment-21603</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Mom Blogs - Blogs for Moms...&lt;/strong&gt;
...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mom Blogs &#8211; Blogs for Moms&#8230;</strong></p><p>&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
