The Zero Short

Wrong

Something for nothing.

Intellectual and financial achievement.

We showed those losers.

Hey, it’s free money!

-==-=–=-==-=-=–==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Possibly Right

Don’t play for the last nickel.  It may cost you a buck or more.

Shorting is not the opposite of being long, it is the opposite of being leveraged long.  You don’t control your trade in entire, and the margin desk, or fear of the margin desk can make you leave a trade prematurely.

Pride goeth before a fall.

Would you rather be right, make money, neither, or both?

Free money in the market exists until too many people start searching for it.

Whom God would destroy, He makes overconfident.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Though I do risk control different than many people, risk control is behind much of what I do in managing money.  Avoid risks that I am not being paid to take, and take risk where I am getting fair compensation or better.

Now, I can think of several companies where I think the common is an eventual zero.  Fannie, Freddie, AIG, GM, and Ford (I am less certain about the last one).  My calls on GM and Ford were ones made long ago.  The same for Fannie and Freddie.  AIG is more recent.

Now, I rarely short, because my risk control methods are not designed to work with shorting.  But one thing I would almost never do is try to “zero short” — short a stock to zero.  As I have said before, seemingly free money brings out the worst in people, and makes them play more aggressively than they should.

Don’t underestimate the power of control.  There is an optionality there that is underappreciated.  With the right offer management can sell assets, change the capital structure, get a bailout, etc.

Don’t overestimate the uniqueness of the reasoning involved.  Zero shorts attract parties wanting to short to the bitter end; they think that zero is inevitable.  No risk here.  One decision.

I would look at the borrow.  Can I borrow a lot more stock easily, without paying a premium either directly, or indirectly through the cost of some derivative instrument? (options, swaps, etc…)  If I can, perhaps I don’t have to worry so much about losing control of the trade.  If not, it may be time to close out the trade (for a little while, then re-evaluate), or at least evaluate how high the price could go in a short squeeze.  As we have seen recently, some lousy companies in a short squeeze can double or triple.  Would I have enough capital to carry the trade under such adverse conditions?

At least I should estimate short-term upside versus downside for that position versus others in the portfolio.  After a successful short, it may not employ a lot of capital; perhaps I should close it out.

What’s that you say?  The borrow is plentiful, and I should short more?  After all, it is going to zero.  I would not do it because the upside/downside ratio is worse than when the  trade began.  Figuratively, playing for that last nickel could cost me several bucks.

What if the position moves against me and the borrow is plentiful?  Should I short more?  After all, it is going to zero.  Sigh.  Review the thesis.  I might look for someone who doesn’t always agree with me, and ask him what he thinks.  If the thesis does not change, I would short a little more once the momentum against the position has stopped.

One more note: I review pricing across the capital structure.  Where does the bank debt trade?  Where are Credit Default Swaps [CDS] trading?  Yields of senior unsecured notes across the maturities?  Junior debt, trust preferreds, hybrids, preferred stock, etc…  These are all relevant bits of data to tell whether the common stock will indeed zero out.  If the next most senior class of capital to the common is trading above 50% of par, I would do more research on my thesis.  If it is over 80% of par, the zero short is not a good idea.

Risk control wins in the long run.  To me shorting all the way to zero is a risky way to do business, and so I am very unlikely to do it.  There is a pride element involved, and all good investing relies on having control over your attitude.  If you decide to zero short, be very careful.  It is not as easy as it looks, even if in the end, it does go to zero.






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Macroeconomics, Portfolio Management, Quantitative Methods, Speculation, Stocks, Structured Products and Derivatives, Value Investing | RSS 2.0 |

2 Responses to The Zero Short

  1. kpk says:

    huh?

    what is zero short
    ?

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin