<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: One Dozen More Notes on the Economic Scene</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/05/20/1729/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/05/20/1729/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Russ Wood</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/05/20/1729/comment-page-1/#comment-21796</link> <dc:creator>Russ Wood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:47:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1729#comment-21796</guid> <description>Re: #6, Asset Allocation.
I share your view of the smaller risk premium.  Lots of press recently about bonds beating stocks over recent, long periods.  But I think you posted in the past about when to favor corporate bonds over stocks and you estimated a 2.5-3% risk premium for stocks over corporates.  Would a 5-7% risk premium over treasuries not be reasonable.
Thanks as always for your efforts.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: #6, Asset Allocation.<br
/> I share your view of the smaller risk premium.  Lots of press recently about bonds beating stocks over recent, long periods.  But I think you posted in the past about when to favor corporate bonds over stocks and you estimated a 2.5-3% risk premium for stocks over corporates.  Would a 5-7% risk premium over treasuries not be reasonable.<br
/> Thanks as always for your efforts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: matt</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/05/20/1729/comment-page-1/#comment-21792</link> <dc:creator>matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:57:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1729#comment-21792</guid> <description>Underwriting hasn&#039;t tightened in Columbus, OH. I know two 23 year-old first time home buyers who just bought houses worth 4 times their income... with no money down.
Whatever happened to loan to value ratios under 1?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Underwriting hasn&#8217;t tightened in Columbus, OH. I know two 23 year-old first time home buyers who just bought houses worth 4 times their income&#8230; with no money down.</p><p>Whatever happened to loan to value ratios under 1?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
