Seven Notes, Primarily on the Financial Sector

1)  I have been arguing for a while that commercial mortgages are an unresolved issue with most banks, who still hold their loans at par.  Contrast that with the pricing on Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities [CMBS] or REIT stock prices, which show commercial real estate pricing in the dumps.  Look at these articles: (one, two, three).  How many commercial properties are inverted?  Who knows, but when properties sell for significantly less than replacement costs, it is not a good scene.

Regarding CMBS, as the loss estimates ratchet up, the credit ratings ratchet down.  Securities sold in 2005 and after will suffer, as well as marginal CMBS from earlier vintages.

2)  Outside of conforming mortgages, losses in residential mortgages are considerable.  Consider how S&P is raising its loss assumptions on alt-A loans.  Or consider how being underwater, or close to underwater affects the willingness of people to default.

3)  That last article helps point out a truth that is neglected.  Defaults predominantly happen when borrowers are underwater, or nearly so.  Changing  the mortgage interest rate is cheaper in the short run, but does not cure  the situation as well as reducing the principal (forgiving part of the loan).  Why less loan forgiveness?  Two reasons: Accounting would require a bigger short-term loss, and the government prefers subidizing a piece at a time, so it prefers smaller annual subsidies, rather than a once-and-for-all cure.  They would rather pay over time, and overcommit future budgets, than pay the full freight now, even if it is cheaper in the long run to do so.

4)  But many defaults are strategic.  The owners know which side their bread is buttered on, and they default when their properties are too far underwater (one, two).

5)  The states can’t print money like the Federal government can.  Excluding California, of course, which has its new currency, the IOU.  (We are still waiting for a secondary market to arise.  Perhaps some enterprising bank  will offer to buy IOUs at a discount.  As it is, banks either honor in full or refuse to honor the IOUs.)  The states represent the current troubles better than the Federal government does, because they must meet the challenge through expense cuts and tax increases, both of which are painful.

All that said, next year may be more painful, because of greater unemployment, and lower taxes from real property.

6)  Beware junior debt.  I know that at other times I have used trust preferred securities offensively to make money as the credit cycle turned in 2002, but that is a very hard game to play, and we aren’t there yet for this cycle.

7) I’ve had many people writing me for investment advice, and in the near term, I will try to write a piece that summarizes my views of what to do now.  In broad, I lean toward reducing risk exposure, and sitting on high quality short term debt.  For those that hedge, quality will be rewarded, and structure penalized over the next  6-12 months.  And, avoid financials, aside from exchanges and insurers with clean assets.






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Accounting, Bonds, Insurance, Macroeconomics, Personal Finance, Portfolio Management, Real Estate and Mortgages, Stocks, Structured Products and Derivatives | RSS 2.0 |

5 Responses to Seven Notes, Primarily on the Financial Sector

  1. But What do I Know? says:

    Thanks as always for the comments, David. Regarding Point 5: CA is running a real-time experiment in the workings of Gresham’s Law. It should provide some fascinating data for a study a few years hence.

    Another interesting development to observe would be the speed at which counterfeit IOU’s appear and develop, especially if the banks refuse to redeem them and a private market emerges.

    CA at this point reminds me of a guy who gets into a bar fight thinking that the bouncers/bystanders are going to break it up before it gets too bad. . .

  2. matt says:

    How can you have a secondary market with this:

    “California’s treasurer is telling recipients of the IOUs that if they sell them to third parties, they will be redeemed by the state treasurer’s office only if accompanied by a notarized bill of sale signed by their listed payee.”

  3. SportsBiz says:

    It’s not just banks with commercial mortgage exposure carried on the books at par that we need to be concerned about. Insurance companies have large exposures to the commercial mortgage market, perhaps in larger numbers than the banks. How much exposure and to what extent are those mortgages underwater? Again, who knows, because they are certainly not being forthcoming about it to investors or regulators (at least in public filings).

    • Insurance company underwriting standards on commercial mortgages have generally been higher than those of the banks, but yes, this is an issue. The insurance companies have greater transparency, though. Every loan is listed in their statutory annual statements, which are usually available to the public.

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin