<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nine Notes on Residential Real Estate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/08/15/nine-notes-on-residential-real-estate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alephblog.com/2009/08/15/nine-notes-on-residential-real-estate/</link>
	<description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:01:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RichL</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2009/08/15/nine-notes-on-residential-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-22936</link>
		<dc:creator>RichL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1956#comment-22936</guid>
		<description>There is a multi-part analysis on the GSE&#039;s that indicates they, esp. FRE, aren&#039;t in such parlous shape- see 

http://brontecapital.blogspot.com/2009/08/modelling-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac_15.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a multi-part analysis on the GSE&#8217;s that indicates they, esp. FRE, aren&#8217;t in such parlous shape- see </p>
<p><a href="http://brontecapital.blogspot.com/2009/08/modelling-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac_15.html" rel="nofollow">http://brontecapital.blogspot.com/2009/08/modelling-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac_15.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sg</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2009/08/15/nine-notes-on-residential-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-22931</link>
		<dc:creator>sg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=1956#comment-22931</guid>
		<description>I thoroughly enjoy reading this blog.  I apologize that this comment is off topic.  However, it seems from the content of this blog that you have an interest in ethical professional standards, education and informing folks of important underlying issues.  I saw recently that there is discussion of allowing some universities to exempt their students from the preliminary actuarial exams.  
http://soa.org/files/pdf/fem-faq.pdf
http://www.casact.org/admissions/FEMletter.pdf

I would be very interested in your views. Perhaps you might be interested in a blog post on the topic.  It is a very unpopular idea among commenters at the Actuarial Outpost site.  

&quot;Feedback will be collected through September 10, 2009. 
This date was selected to provide the Boards of the CIA, CAS, and SOA with member comments prior to each organization’s fall Board meeting. Comments received after this date will still be considered.  Please submit your feedback along with your name and organizational affiliation to  fem@actuarialdirectory.org.&quot;

As the professional competence of  actuaries underlies the integrity of so many of our public institutions and private businesses, it seems that exempting actuarial students from preliminary exams would be a step in the wrong direction.

Sorry for the off topic comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thoroughly enjoy reading this blog.  I apologize that this comment is off topic.  However, it seems from the content of this blog that you have an interest in ethical professional standards, education and informing folks of important underlying issues.  I saw recently that there is discussion of allowing some universities to exempt their students from the preliminary actuarial exams.<br />
<a href="http://soa.org/files/pdf/fem-faq.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://soa.org/files/pdf/fem-faq.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.casact.org/admissions/FEMletter.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.casact.org/admissions/FEMletter.pdf</a></p>
<p>I would be very interested in your views. Perhaps you might be interested in a blog post on the topic.  It is a very unpopular idea among commenters at the Actuarial Outpost site.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Feedback will be collected through September 10, 2009.<br />
This date was selected to provide the Boards of the CIA, CAS, and SOA with member comments prior to each organization’s fall Board meeting. Comments received after this date will still be considered.  Please submit your feedback along with your name and organizational affiliation to  <a href="mailto:fem@actuarialdirectory.org">fem@actuarialdirectory.org</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>As the professional competence of  actuaries underlies the integrity of so many of our public institutions and private businesses, it seems that exempting actuarial students from preliminary exams would be a step in the wrong direction.</p>
<p>Sorry for the off topic comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
