Book Review: Finding Alpha

I found this book both easy and hard to review.  Easy, because it adopts two of my biases: Modern portfolio theory doesn’t work, and the equity premium is near zero.  Hard, because the book needed a better editor, and plods in the middle.  I don’t ordinarily do this, but I felt the reviews at Amazon were valuable, particularly the most critical one, which still liked the book.  I liked the book, despite its weaknesses.

One core idea of the book is that risk is not rewarded on net.  It doesn’t matter if you measure risk by standard deviation of returns, beta, or credit rating (with junk bonds).  Junk underperforms investment grade bonds on average.  Lower beta and standard deviation stocks overperform on average.

A second core idea is that some people are so risk averse that they only accept the safest investments, which leaves investment opportunities for those that are willing to compromise a little with credit quality or maturity.  Moving from money markets to one year out is an almost riskless move for most, and usually adds a lot of excess return.  Bond ladders do the same thing, though Falkenstein does not discuss those.

Also, the move from high investment grade to low investment grade does not involve a lot more investment risk, but it does offer more yield on a risk adjusted basis.

A third core idea is that equities, though more risky than high quality bonds, have not returned that much more than bonds when the returns are measured properly.  See this post for more details.

A fourth core idea is that people are more willing to take risks to be wealthy than theory would admit.  Most of those risks lose money on average , but people still pursue them.

A fifth core idea is that alpha is hard to define.  Helpfully, Falkenstein defines alpha as comparative advantage.  Focus on what you can do better than anyone else.

A sixth core idea is that leverage, however obtained, does not add alpha of itself.  This should be obvious, but people like to try to hit home runs.

A seventh core idea is that when an alpha generation technique becomes well-known, it loses its potency.

An eighth core idea is that people are more envious than greedy; they care more about their relative position in this world than their absolute well-being.

One idea he could have developed more fully is that retail investors are easily deluded by yield.  They underestimate the amount of yield needed to compensate for illiquidity, optionality, and default.  Wall Street makes money out of jamming retail with yieldy investments that deliver capital losses.

Another idea he he could have developed is that strategies that lose their potency lose investors, and tend to become less efficiently priced, leading to new opportunities.  Investment ideas go in and out of fashion, leading to overshooting and washouts.

How one achieves alpha is not defined — Falkenstein leaves that blank, because there is no simple formula, and I respect him for that.  He encourages readers to devise their own methods in areas where there is not a lot of competition.  Alpha  comes from being better than your competition.

Summary

What this all says to me is that investors are too hopeful.  They look for the big wins and ignore smaller ways to make extra money.  They swing for the fences and get an “out,” rather than blooping singles with some regularity.  I like blooping singles with regularity.

I recommend this book for quantitative investors who can find a way to buy it for less than $40.  The sticker price is $95, though it can be obtained for less than $60.  Try to find a way to borrow the book, through interlibrary loan if necessary — that was how I read Margin of Safety by Seth Klarman.  Klarman’s book is not worth $1000.  Falkenstein’s book is not worth $95.  Falkenstein’s very good blog will give you much of what you need to know for free, and even more than he has covered in his book.

This book would also be valuable for academics and asset allocators wedded to Modern Portfolio Theory and a large value for the equity premium, though some would snipe at aspects of the presentation.  Parts of the book are more rigorous than others.

If you still want to buy the book at the non-discounted price, you can buy it here: Finding Alpha: The Search for Alpha When Risk and Return Break Down (Wiley Finance)

PS: Unless I state otherwise, I read the books cover-to-cover, unlike most book reviewers.  The books are often different from what the PR flacks encourage reviewers to think.  If you enter Amazon through my site and buy anything, I get a small commission.






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Academic Finance, Asset Allocation, Bonds, Book reviews, Personal Finance, Portfolio Management, Quantitative Methods, Speculation, Stocks, Structured Products and Derivatives, Value Investing | RSS 2.0 |

5 Responses to Book Review: Finding Alpha

  1. Rower says:

    Good stuff. One must read your reviews before reading the books. As a student of MPT (unfortunately) we were tought that more risk (always)=more return in classes and in business. Actually, it was pretty shocking for me (a rookie in investment business) to realize the theory and practice is different in real life. Still searching for the answer..

  2. Eric says:

    Thanks for the review!

    You can download a brief and free version of the main theme at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1420356 (Risk and Return in General: Theory and Evidence).

    Also, I have videos going over various chapters of the book at http://www.defprob.com/video/ , which also has downloadable powerpoints.

  3. Wide Moat says:

    As someone who loves books and appreciates rigorously defended contrarian theses, I would say the book is worth $95.

    The book is the tangible manifestation of work that we all appreciate, so buying books like this are a way of affirming the value of the author’s work–whether you agree or disagree.

  4. Gary says:

    David — don’t know if you saw, but the author of this book has a post on his blog talking about risk management, and (like you) he mentions the WSJ story about Graham Capital Mgmt

    http://falkenblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/people-lie-about-alpha.html

    The author suggests (facetiously we hope) a good strategy is to short companies whose risk management is highlighted in newspapers / magazines. Enron, Golden West Financial and others have all won various “risk manager of the year” awards and/or been Harvard Business school study cases in how to manage risk (Enron)

  5. Gary — Yeah, I saw that and could not tell what his intent was toward Graham. I would have guessed he would have been more approving, because they analyze risks in a multi-dimensional way, and don’t use (for the most part, academic definitions of risk.

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin