A Moment of Minsky, Redux

It’s been two years since my last major post on this issue.  A lot has happened since then, much of which points out the truth of what I said.

If governments could be powerful enough to insure the security of individuals, and not harm the ability of the economy to grow, I would not be as strident on this point as I am.  I agree with Minsky on description, but disagree on prescription.  Minsky’s prescription was that of Keynes, but on steroids.  Run a hyper-stimulative monetary and fiscal policy.  Well, we have that now, and it is not helping much; it only balloons the national debt.  The right answer is to do almost nothing, but provide for ways to expedite bankruptcy claims.

Why such a harsh prescription?  We don’t want financial institutions, much less large ones, to rely on the idea that the Federal Government has their back.  That leads to excessive risk-taking.  We also should not want the US Government to be deeply involved in the financial sector for several reasons:

  • The Treasury will be captured by financial interests (already done!)
  • Fair pricing of loan yields versus marginal cost of taxation will get muddled.
  • Political haggling will choke Capitol Hill.
  • The blob will grow.  No, not the Department of Education, a la William Bennett.  I am talking about the Fed.
  • Individuals and corporations will be more cautious about their finances, and will manage them more prudently.

Aside from constraining the total leverage of the economy, which I have suggested in the past, there is no way of escaping the pains of the boom-bust cycle.  I would say to everyone, “Grow up.  Our Government can’t control the economy in the long run, so accept that, and live with the boom-bust cycle.  Eliminate government meddling, especially the Fed.  All attempts to smooth the cycle lead to a bigger bust later.  Would you rather take some pain now, or risk the creditworthiness of our nation?”

One reader has recently asked me about sovereign defaults.  I need to think about that, and give you all a better piece later, but this is not a time to be careless about the US, unless the political mood so changes, that large tax increases would happen.






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Bonds, Macroeconomics, public policy | RSS 2.0 |

4 Responses to A Moment of Minsky, Redux

  1. tom says:

    the problem of trading a few big bubbles for many small bubbles is that you may end up with small recessions every two to three years.

  2. Albert says:

    “Individuals and corporations will be more cautious about their finances, and will manage them more prudently.”

    I’m not sure I follow you. Doesn’t the increased government role increase moral hazard? Or are people more reluctant to invest as long as “zombies” are kept alive?

  3. Gus Rabson says:

    Are you suggesting that we go back to a time when each bank printed its own currency?

    Gus

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin