<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QUEASY &#8212; QUantitative Easing Aids Speculators Yields</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/09/16/queasy-quantitative-easing-aids-speculators-yields/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alephblog.com/2009/09/16/queasy-quantitative-easing-aids-speculators-yields/</link>
	<description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:59:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maynardGkeynes</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2009/09/16/queasy-quantitative-easing-aids-speculators-yields/comment-page-1/#comment-23310</link>
		<dc:creator>maynardGkeynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2015#comment-23310</guid>
		<description>David, this an insightful take. Thanks for expressing it so well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, this an insightful take. Thanks for expressing it so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: But What do I Know?</title>
		<link>http://alephblog.com/2009/09/16/queasy-quantitative-easing-aids-speculators-yields/comment-page-1/#comment-23307</link>
		<dc:creator>But What do I Know?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2015#comment-23307</guid>
		<description>Well put, David.  I used to think the Fed was either stupid or corrupt, but now I&#039;m beginning to think that they are just bureaucrats afraid to do anything different that they can be blamed for.  It&#039;s the equivalent of a portfolio manager buying IBM--nobody ever got fired for buying IBM.  No one at the Fed ever got fired for lowering interest rates--when it blows up again they can throw up their hands and say they did the best they could--or that they could fix the problem this time if only they were given more authority.

On the other hand, if they lean against the speculation, they will be blamed for &quot;stunting the recovery&quot; or worse.  In Bernancke&#039;s mind I&#039;m sure there is nothing worse than repeating the tightening of 1937--he spend his whole career fighting a war as out of date as the cavalry-breakout obsessed generals of World War I.  The only tragedy is the damage his &quot;leadership&quot; will cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put, David.  I used to think the Fed was either stupid or corrupt, but now I&#8217;m beginning to think that they are just bureaucrats afraid to do anything different that they can be blamed for.  It&#8217;s the equivalent of a portfolio manager buying IBM&#8211;nobody ever got fired for buying IBM.  No one at the Fed ever got fired for lowering interest rates&#8211;when it blows up again they can throw up their hands and say they did the best they could&#8211;or that they could fix the problem this time if only they were given more authority.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if they lean against the speculation, they will be blamed for &#8220;stunting the recovery&#8221; or worse.  In Bernancke&#8217;s mind I&#8217;m sure there is nothing worse than repeating the tightening of 1937&#8211;he spend his whole career fighting a war as out of date as the cavalry-breakout obsessed generals of World War I.  The only tragedy is the damage his &#8220;leadership&#8221; will cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
