<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: On Vanilla Products</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/09/26/on-vanilla-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/09/26/on-vanilla-products/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Harper Capital</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/09/26/on-vanilla-products/comment-page-1/#comment-23404</link> <dc:creator>Harper Capital</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:43:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2044#comment-23404</guid> <description>David, doesn&#039;t Vanguard and Fidelity offer a low fee VA product using in house funds?  At some point I another low fee insurace offering was out there (under 50bps+fund fees) for no fee planners, but cannot remember the name for the life of me.  I think they worked with Rydex to grab traders assets.
I agree it&#039;s a great way to retain sticky assets.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, doesn&#8217;t Vanguard and Fidelity offer a low fee VA product using in house funds?  At some point I another low fee insurace offering was out there (under 50bps+fund fees) for no fee planners, but cannot remember the name for the life of me.  I think they worked with Rydex to grab traders assets.</p><p>I agree it&#8217;s a great way to retain sticky assets.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/09/26/on-vanilla-products/comment-page-1/#comment-23387</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:12:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2044#comment-23387</guid> <description>Varada, you are right -- this is a product to be marketed by the mutual funds themselves.  &quot;Sir, would you like the T-class shares?  Higher expense charge, but they are tax-deferred.  Otherwise the same as the class of shares you would ordinarily buy.&quot;  The mutual funds make their money off of their ordinary fee structure, and gain stickier business as a reward.
Also could be used by no fee financial planners.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Varada, you are right &#8212; this is a product to be marketed by the mutual funds themselves.  &#8220;Sir, would you like the T-class shares?  Higher expense charge, but they are tax-deferred.  Otherwise the same as the class of shares you would ordinarily buy.&#8221;  The mutual funds make their money off of their ordinary fee structure, and gain stickier business as a reward.</p><p>Also could be used by no fee financial planners.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Varada</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/09/26/on-vanilla-products/comment-page-1/#comment-23370</link> <dc:creator>Varada</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:23:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2044#comment-23370</guid> <description>David,
Regarding your comment about wrapping a variable annuity for 40bp,it is impractical simply because most of the current charges on a VA wrapper(say 100bp out of 140 bp) goes to the salesman who sold the VA to a customer.That is why VA wrappers are expensive.Selling it for 40bp will require a totally new approach to distribution.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p><p>Regarding your comment about wrapping a variable annuity for 40bp,it is impractical simply because most of the current charges on a VA wrapper(say 100bp out of 140 bp) goes to the salesman who sold the VA to a customer.That is why VA wrappers are expensive.Selling it for 40bp will require a totally new approach to distribution.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
