<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: US Dollar: &#8220;I&#8217;m Not Dead Yet!&#8221;</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: DaveinHackensack</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23506</link> <dc:creator>DaveinHackensack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:45:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23506</guid> <description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;Whatever country of our world has the status of reserve currency must issue debt, and a lot of it, that other countries can invest in to park their idle cash balances.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;
I made this point in more detail &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehackensack.blogspot.com/2009/10/rumors-of-dollars-death-greatly.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;elsewhere&lt;/a&gt; today, but instead of having surplus countries buy up U.S. debt to satiate their demand for dollar-based assets, why doesn&#039;t the U.S. government offer them an equity-like investment instead? Specifically, why not offer shares in a sort of massive master limited partnership that would invest its assets in nuclear power plants and other infrastructure, and pay dividends out of the revenues generated from those infrastructure assets?
Unlike the proceeds from the sale of Treasuries, which can go to fund transfer payments and health care for retirees, or extended military expeditions, proceeds from the sale of shares in this master limited partnership would go toward increasing productive capacity, which would fuel future economic growth in the U.S.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Whatever country of our world has the status of reserve currency must issue debt, and a lot of it, that other countries can invest in to park their idle cash balances.&#8221;</i></p><p>I made this point in more detail <a
href="http://thehackensack.blogspot.com/2009/10/rumors-of-dollars-death-greatly.html" rel="nofollow">elsewhere</a> today, but instead of having surplus countries buy up U.S. debt to satiate their demand for dollar-based assets, why doesn&#8217;t the U.S. government offer them an equity-like investment instead? Specifically, why not offer shares in a sort of massive master limited partnership that would invest its assets in nuclear power plants and other infrastructure, and pay dividends out of the revenues generated from those infrastructure assets?</p><p>Unlike the proceeds from the sale of Treasuries, which can go to fund transfer payments and health care for retirees, or extended military expeditions, proceeds from the sale of shares in this master limited partnership would go toward increasing productive capacity, which would fuel future economic growth in the U.S.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spyros</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23451</link> <dc:creator>spyros</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:11:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23451</guid> <description>why should we have only one safe haven currency? with reference to euro drawbacks, it is my belief that the lack of a strong debt market is an advantage as there is no room for supply shocks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why should we have only one safe haven currency? with reference to euro drawbacks, it is my belief that the lack of a strong debt market is an advantage as there is no room for supply shocks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Frank</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23448</link> <dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:26:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23448</guid> <description>David - one would like to think that not honouring contracts will bite them, but it depends on market power, which the Chinese are developing more and more.  A similar situation developed in the early nineties with the California PUC ordered utilities there to break long term natural gas purchase contracts to take advantage of the much lower spot price. California has its problems, but I don&#039;t think they ever suffered ill effects from that decision.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; one would like to think that not honouring contracts will bite them, but it depends on market power, which the Chinese are developing more and more.  A similar situation developed in the early nineties with the California PUC ordered utilities there to break long term natural gas purchase contracts to take advantage of the much lower spot price. California has its problems, but I don&#8217;t think they ever suffered ill effects from that decision.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RichL</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23447</link> <dc:creator>RichL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:27:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23447</guid> <description>I know that purchasing power parity is less important than interest rates for the carry trade in affecting currency rates, but it is REALLY expensive to live in Europe vs. the US. And the last time I checked, Harvard and MIT accept dollars for tuition.
Some less restrictive policies by the US govt. to make it easier to visit the US would help the current account deficit. Tax policies that tax consumption rather than income would go a long way toward making the US more attractive as a place to employ, rather than fire, people.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that purchasing power parity is less important than interest rates for the carry trade in affecting currency rates, but it is REALLY expensive to live in Europe vs. the US. And the last time I checked, Harvard and MIT accept dollars for tuition.</p><p>Some less restrictive policies by the US govt. to make it easier to visit the US would help the current account deficit. Tax policies that tax consumption rather than income would go a long way toward making the US more attractive as a place to employ, rather than fire, people.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23446</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:34:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23446</guid> <description>Edward, no I didn&#039;t.  I like your work.  If I did a rewrite, I would have mentioned your piece below, and not grouped it with the first piece, of which I was critical.  My apologies.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward, no I didn&#8217;t.  I like your work.  If I did a rewrite, I would have mentioned your piece below, and not grouped it with the first piece, of which I was critical.  My apologies.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh Stern</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23445</link> <dc:creator>Josh Stern</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:24:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23445</guid> <description>Seems like there is some huge money being made accommodating investors desire for liquid commodity investments:  http://seekingalpha.com/article/165106-natural-gas-worst-investment-ever
Who are the main players making that profit?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like there is some huge money being made accommodating investors desire for liquid commodity investments: <a
href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/165106-natural-gas-worst-investment-ever" rel="nofollow">http://seekingalpha.com/article/165106-natural-gas-worst-investment-ever</a></p><p>Who are the main players making that profit?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Edward Harrison</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23444</link> <dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:07:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23444</guid> <description>David,
I&#039;m not sure if you saw me as one of the pundits predicting an imminent demise for the dollar.  But, in case it wasn&#039;t clear from my post, i am pretty much in agreement with your sentiments:
&quot;the US Dollar will not eventually be replaced as the global reserve currency — it will be replaced eventually, but there will be a lot of “sturm und drang” in the process.&quot;
And I really don&#039;t buy the story that the Chinese are ready to dump the dollar here and now. Then they replace it with what?  As George Soros has said, &quot;the dollar is a very weak currency except all the others.&quot;
http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/soros-the-dollar-is-a-very-weak-currency-except-all-the-others.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure if you saw me as one of the pundits predicting an imminent demise for the dollar.  But, in case it wasn&#8217;t clear from my post, i am pretty much in agreement with your sentiments:</p><p>&#8220;the US Dollar will not eventually be replaced as the global reserve currency — it will be replaced eventually, but there will be a lot of “sturm und drang” in the process.&#8221;</p><p>And I really don&#8217;t buy the story that the Chinese are ready to dump the dollar here and now. Then they replace it with what?  As George Soros has said, &#8220;the dollar is a very weak currency except all the others.&#8221;</p><p><a
href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/soros-the-dollar-is-a-very-weak-currency-except-all-the-others.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/soros-the-dollar-is-a-very-weak-currency-except-all-the-others.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23443</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:26:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23443</guid> <description>Three other notes:
1) BWDIK -- yeah, my conclusion too, and Caroline Baum&#039;s as well (last I saw).
2) The price of the tradeoff for goods for US debts will continue to erode.  I am a US Dollar bear over the long run.  That doesn&#039;t mean there can&#039;t be occasional sharp rallies if Fed policy tightens.  With dollar lending funding more carry trades, the situation becomes more volatile, with all of the hot money.
3) This makes the shortening of maturities of US Treasury debt more worrisome.  The amount to roll over will grow dramatically in the next five years.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three other notes:</p><p>1) BWDIK &#8212; yeah, my conclusion too, and Caroline Baum&#8217;s as well (last I saw).</p><p>2) The price of the tradeoff for goods for US debts will continue to erode.  I am a US Dollar bear over the long run.  That doesn&#8217;t mean there can&#8217;t be occasional sharp rallies if Fed policy tightens.  With dollar lending funding more carry trades, the situation becomes more volatile, with all of the hot money.</p><p>3) This makes the shortening of maturities of US Treasury debt more worrisome.  The amount to roll over will grow dramatically in the next five years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23442</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:20:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23442</guid> <description>David, I appreciate your thoughts.  My main point here is not that the US Dollar will not eventually be replaced as the global reserve currency -- it will be replaced eventually, but there will be a lot of &quot;sturm und drang&quot; in the process.
I have two pieces on international economics coming up in the next week which will make this clearer, but until major nations give up neomercantilism, keeping their currencies artificially weak, they will have to keep absorbing US Dollar claims.  It&#039;s a lousy way to run the global economy, but they are the active parties in this mess.  The US is in some ways the most flexible economy in the world, taking the other side of the trade on imbalances actively foisted on the world by the neomercantilists.
João -- I would like to see a commodity currency.  It would be a good thing for all in the long run.  In the short run, it would likely lead to economic contraction, as monetary debasement would be more difficult, and asset reflation would slow.
Yes, it is hegemony&#039;s crisis.  The US Dollar is a symbol of a greater reality.  But just as it is tough to replace the Dollar, what nation could replace the US in world affairs?  (I write as one that has not favored our foreign policy over the last eight years.)
Who could replace the US?  Who does the world trust?  Who has the strength?  Who has the ability to act when needed?  The US is the best of a bunch of bad options -- both as a currency, and as a Hegemon (leader).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I appreciate your thoughts.  My main point here is not that the US Dollar will not eventually be replaced as the global reserve currency &#8212; it will be replaced eventually, but there will be a lot of &#8220;sturm und drang&#8221; in the process.</p><p>I have two pieces on international economics coming up in the next week which will make this clearer, but until major nations give up neomercantilism, keeping their currencies artificially weak, they will have to keep absorbing US Dollar claims.  It&#8217;s a lousy way to run the global economy, but they are the active parties in this mess.  The US is in some ways the most flexible economy in the world, taking the other side of the trade on imbalances actively foisted on the world by the neomercantilists.</p><p>João &#8212; I would like to see a commodity currency.  It would be a good thing for all in the long run.  In the short run, it would likely lead to economic contraction, as monetary debasement would be more difficult, and asset reflation would slow.</p><p>Yes, it is hegemony&#8217;s crisis.  The US Dollar is a symbol of a greater reality.  But just as it is tough to replace the Dollar, what nation could replace the US in world affairs?  (I write as one that has not favored our foreign policy over the last eight years.)</p><p>Who could replace the US?  Who does the world trust?  Who has the strength?  Who has the ability to act when needed?  The US is the best of a bunch of bad options &#8212; both as a currency, and as a Hegemon (leader).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: João Carlos</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/07/us-dollar-im-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-23441</link> <dc:creator>João Carlos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:33:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2066#comment-23441</guid> <description>&quot;[...] unless a commodity standard currency comes into being.&quot;
Yes, it is. That is your answer. It is being made. Slowly, trying to not be noisy, but it is being made. USA governement don&#039;t like it, but it can do nothing about it.
Remember, money is an illusion. We call money everything we want to call money. If we call bull &quot;money&#039;, then we will have the &quot;bull-money&quot;. And so the latim word &quot;pecus&quot; will be the origin of the word &quot;pecuniary&quot;. And &quot;peculate&quot;, Madof&#039;s style.
The only real thing is the goods you can make. China can make everything. USA can make only derivatives. And mcmansions. But macmansionas aren&#039;t goods you can ship to other countries.
It is not a capitalism&#039;s crisis, it is a hegemony&#039;s crisis.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[...] unless a commodity standard currency comes into being.&#8221;</p><p>Yes, it is. That is your answer. It is being made. Slowly, trying to not be noisy, but it is being made. USA governement don&#8217;t like it, but it can do nothing about it.</p><p>Remember, money is an illusion. We call money everything we want to call money. If we call bull &#8220;money&#8217;, then we will have the &#8220;bull-money&#8221;. And so the latim word &#8220;pecus&#8221; will be the origin of the word &#8220;pecuniary&#8221;. And &#8220;peculate&#8221;, Madof&#8217;s style.</p><p>The only real thing is the goods you can make. China can make everything. USA can make only derivatives. And mcmansions. But macmansionas aren&#8217;t goods you can ship to other countries.</p><p>It is not a capitalism&#8217;s crisis, it is a hegemony&#8217;s crisis.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
