<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Pension Apprehension</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/10/10/pension-apprehension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/10/pension-apprehension/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/10/pension-apprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-23504</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:25:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2074#comment-23504</guid> <description>Review your form 5500 for the DB plan, and see how well it is funded.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Review your form 5500 for the DB plan, and see how well it is funded.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Craig</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/10/pension-apprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-23500</link> <dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:36:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2074#comment-23500</guid> <description>I have a DB plan with Safeway Stores-UFCW, which I&#039;ve been collecting for a few years. I&#039;m cooked?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a DB plan with Safeway Stores-UFCW, which I&#8217;ve been collecting for a few years. I&#8217;m cooked?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/10/pension-apprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-23491</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:35:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2074#comment-23491</guid> <description>I think the figure on current pension shortfall for the states is aroud $2 Trillion -- I don&#039;t have a link, but if you go through my pension tab and search on &quot;states,&quot; I think you might find it.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;as_q=states&amp;as_epq=&amp;as_oq=&amp;as_eq=&amp;num=10&amp;lr=&amp;as_filetype=&amp;ft=i&amp;as_sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Falephblog.com%2Fcategory%2Fpensions%2F&amp;as_qdr=all&amp;as_rights=&amp;as_occt=any&amp;cr=&amp;as_nlo=&amp;as_nhi=&amp;safe=images
Oh, the $2 Trillion does not include retiree healthcare...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the figure on current pension shortfall for the states is aroud $2 Trillion &#8212; I don&#8217;t have a link, but if you go through my pension tab and search on &#8220;states,&#8221; I think you might find it.</p><p><a
href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;as_q=states&#038;as_epq=&#038;as_oq=&#038;as_eq=&#038;num=10&#038;lr=&#038;as_filetype=&#038;ft=i&#038;as_sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Falephblog.com%2Fcategory%2Fpensions%2F&#038;as_qdr=all&#038;as_rights=&#038;as_occt=any&#038;cr=&#038;as_nlo=&#038;as_nhi=&#038;safe=images" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;as_q=states&#038;as_epq=&#038;as_oq=&#038;as_eq=&#038;num=10&#038;lr=&#038;as_filetype=&#038;ft=i&#038;as_sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Falephblog.com%2Fcategory%2Fpensions%2F&#038;as_qdr=all&#038;as_rights=&#038;as_occt=any&#038;cr=&#038;as_nlo=&#038;as_nhi=&#038;safe=images</a></p><p>Oh, the $2 Trillion does not include retiree healthcare&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/10/pension-apprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-23489</link> <dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:33:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2074#comment-23489</guid> <description>David - I am increasingly worried about the looming municipal pension crisis.  Any idea of how to size this issue in total dollars?  Any good sources on how big the problem might be in 5-10 years?  I assume the federal government will be forced to step up and save the municipalities (how could BofA and Citi be saved and not California) so I guess what I am really wondering is how much more the federal government needs to come up with.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; I am increasingly worried about the looming municipal pension crisis.  Any idea of how to size this issue in total dollars?  Any good sources on how big the problem might be in 5-10 years?  I assume the federal government will be forced to step up and save the municipalities (how could BofA and Citi be saved and not California) so I guess what I am really wondering is how much more the federal government needs to come up with.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A.S.</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/10/pension-apprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-23472</link> <dc:creator>A.S.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:22:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2074#comment-23472</guid> <description>Thank goodness for availability of 401k&#039;s.  Where else would someone with halfway decent income and no real estate interest deductions (or any other) get ANY kind of break on taxes? The annual limit to 401k should be increased, as far as I am concerned.
However, no thanks to the idea of trustees managing them.  Haven&#039;t we plenty of examples (as in Mr. Miller in your piece)in the mutual fund industry do a terrible job.  Mutual Fund managers are trustees of other people&#039;s money as well, be it a 401k or any other type of account.
One of my pet peaves is the government endorsed default option of Target Funds. Please... Plus Stable Value Funds which you have often covered here may have been all right for safety as we have needed in the melt down but really had me worried, too.  Why so many 401ks do not have a pure T-bill money market option I do not understand. Now there&#039;s a huge ready-market for all the government&#039;s funding needs!
One thing I have observed is not the picking of &quot;winning&quot; investments to achieve a retirement savings goal, but diligent and consistent saving of as large an amount as possible. All the 401k participants who chase last year&#039;s winners and find themselves with large losses could have ploughed their contributions into (almost no interest) stable value or any MM available, and been better off. There are lots of participants with no idea how to diversify their contributions, and sadly, only a tiny tiny percentage of advisors or brokers who don&#039;t talk their own book and can be trusted, or follow up consistently rather than &quot;sell and run&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness for availability of 401k&#8217;s.  Where else would someone with halfway decent income and no real estate interest deductions (or any other) get ANY kind of break on taxes? The annual limit to 401k should be increased, as far as I am concerned.</p><p>However, no thanks to the idea of trustees managing them.  Haven&#8217;t we plenty of examples (as in Mr. Miller in your piece)in the mutual fund industry do a terrible job.  Mutual Fund managers are trustees of other people&#8217;s money as well, be it a 401k or any other type of account.</p><p>One of my pet peaves is the government endorsed default option of Target Funds. Please&#8230; Plus Stable Value Funds which you have often covered here may have been all right for safety as we have needed in the melt down but really had me worried, too.  Why so many 401ks do not have a pure T-bill money market option I do not understand. Now there&#8217;s a huge ready-market for all the government&#8217;s funding needs!</p><p>One thing I have observed is not the picking of &#8220;winning&#8221; investments to achieve a retirement savings goal, but diligent and consistent saving of as large an amount as possible. All the 401k participants who chase last year&#8217;s winners and find themselves with large losses could have ploughed their contributions into (almost no interest) stable value or any MM available, and been better off. There are lots of participants with no idea how to diversify their contributions, and sadly, only a tiny tiny percentage of advisors or brokers who don&#8217;t talk their own book and can be trusted, or follow up consistently rather than &#8220;sell and run&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/10/pension-apprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-23471</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:27:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2074#comment-23471</guid> <description>tradeking13 -- you are right and I apologize.  It was the title of the piece that overstated the conclusions of the author, and encouraged me to misstate its conclusions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tradeking13 &#8212; you are right and I apologize.  It was the title of the piece that overstated the conclusions of the author, and encouraged me to misstate its conclusions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tradeking13</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/10/pension-apprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-23469</link> <dc:creator>tradeking13</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:33:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2074#comment-23469</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think the article advocates abolishing the 401(k), rather:
&quot;The time may have come to consider returning 401(k) plans to their original position as a third tier of retirement planning, behind pensions and Social Security&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the article advocates abolishing the 401(k), rather:</p><p>&#8220;The time may have come to consider returning 401(k) plans to their original position as a third tier of retirement planning, behind pensions and Social Security&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
