<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Some Praise and Questions for the US Treasury</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/10/28/some-praise-and-questions-for-the-us-treasury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/28/some-praise-and-questions-for-the-us-treasury/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: But What do I Know?</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/28/some-praise-and-questions-for-the-us-treasury/comment-page-1/#comment-23597</link> <dc:creator>But What do I Know?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:45:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2108#comment-23597</guid> <description>Trenchant comments, David.  I would like to pick a couple of nits, however.
In regards to the Treasury lenghtening maturities, my cynical side whispers that this is Geithner&#039;s way of playing chicken with the Fed, to force them to begin QE 2.  If the ten and thirty year rates shoot up, won&#039;t Uncle Ben feel compelled to muscle them down again?  Look at it this way--it&#039;s like your ne&#039;er-do-well brother-in-law demonstrating his fiscal responsibility by promising to pay you interest on a long-term loan as opposed to simply hitting you up for money every payday.  Do you really feel better about the former?
I think the flows from Social Security have already reversed, and absent a tax increase or benefit cut or a miraculous recovery in employment (guess which one we&#039;re hoping for) will stay that way.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trenchant comments, David.  I would like to pick a couple of nits, however.</p><p>In regards to the Treasury lenghtening maturities, my cynical side whispers that this is Geithner&#8217;s way of playing chicken with the Fed, to force them to begin QE 2.  If the ten and thirty year rates shoot up, won&#8217;t Uncle Ben feel compelled to muscle them down again?  Look at it this way&#8211;it&#8217;s like your ne&#8217;er-do-well brother-in-law demonstrating his fiscal responsibility by promising to pay you interest on a long-term loan as opposed to simply hitting you up for money every payday.  Do you really feel better about the former?</p><p>I think the flows from Social Security have already reversed, and absent a tax increase or benefit cut or a miraculous recovery in employment (guess which one we&#8217;re hoping for) will stay that way.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IF</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/10/28/some-praise-and-questions-for-the-us-treasury/comment-page-1/#comment-23594</link> <dc:creator>IF</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2108#comment-23594</guid> <description>Good observations, as usual. I am actually one of the buyers of 30 year zeros. In moderation and only federally backed entities. I&#039;ve observed the same 20 year peak, which is a bit bothersome. It was less pronounced a while ago, but can still be observed abroad with Bunds. A bit of lengthening seems to benefit everyone. Increase it too much and I would be afraid that the feds are planing to monetize the debt. Walking a fine line...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good observations, as usual. I am actually one of the buyers of 30 year zeros. In moderation and only federally backed entities. I&#8217;ve observed the same 20 year peak, which is a bit bothersome. It was less pronounced a while ago, but can still be observed abroad with Bunds. A bit of lengthening seems to benefit everyone. Increase it too much and I would be afraid that the feds are planing to monetize the debt. Walking a fine line&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
