<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Dubai? Do Sell?</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/11/27/dubai-do-sell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/11/27/dubai-do-sell/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/11/27/dubai-do-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-23794</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:14:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2167#comment-23794</guid> <description>Right -- F&amp;F are big.  But would they let Farmer Mac go down?  There are certain odd DO Transportation bonds that are non-guaranteed.  Would they let those fail?  Would they let a FHLB fail?  I don&#039;t want to find out.
As for Dubai, it may be a bargaining ploy.  Really not sure though.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.15417e8f63a995484187728fd215d360.b71&amp;show_article=1</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right &#8212; F&amp;F are big.  But would they let Farmer Mac go down?  There are certain odd DO Transportation bonds that are non-guaranteed.  Would they let those fail?  Would they let a FHLB fail?  I don&#8217;t want to find out.</p><p>As for Dubai, it may be a bargaining ploy.  Really not sure though.</p><p><a
href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.15417e8f63a995484187728fd215d360.b71&#038;show_article=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.15417e8f63a995484187728fd215d360.b71&#038;show_article=1</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stuart</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/11/27/dubai-do-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-23789</link> <dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:23:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2167#comment-23789</guid> <description>Thanks for the reply, David. I take your point about the guarantees.
The systemic importance of Fannie and Freddie was clear given their pivotal role in the market at/near the centre of the credit crunch. With Dubai World I&#039;m less convinced. In normal times the failure of a construction company ought not to threaten disruption of the entire financial system. These, however, are not normal times.
A very nice blog, by the way. Regards.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply, David. I take your point about the guarantees.</p><p>The systemic importance of Fannie and Freddie was clear given their pivotal role in the market at/near the centre of the credit crunch. With Dubai World I&#8217;m less convinced. In normal times the failure of a construction company ought not to threaten disruption of the entire financial system. These, however, are not normal times.</p><p>A very nice blog, by the way. Regards.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/11/27/dubai-do-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-23788</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:54:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2167#comment-23788</guid> <description>I did not make any statements about Dubai government guarantees; there aren&#039;t any explicit guarantees.  Any guarantee is implicit at best... the US wouldn&#039;t let Fannie and Freddie go under.  That said, unless Abu Dhabi steps in, Dubai alone will have a hard time supporting Dubai World.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not make any statements about Dubai government guarantees; there aren&#8217;t any explicit guarantees.  Any guarantee is implicit at best&#8230; the US wouldn&#8217;t let Fannie and Freddie go under.  That said, unless Abu Dhabi steps in, Dubai alone will have a hard time supporting Dubai World.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stuart</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/11/27/dubai-do-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-23786</link> <dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:08:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2167#comment-23786</guid> <description>Hi, you assume that there are some debt guarantees from the government. How well based it that assumption?
Willem Buiter asserts that this is merely a case of limited liability working its magic:
http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2009/11/polite-sugggestion-to-the-dubai-sovereign-that-creditors-of-dubai-world-not-be-bailed-out/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, you assume that there are some debt guarantees from the government. How well based it that assumption?</p><p>Willem Buiter asserts that this is merely a case of limited liability working its magic:</p><p><a
href="http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2009/11/polite-sugggestion-to-the-dubai-sovereign-that-creditors-of-dubai-world-not-be-bailed-out/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2009/11/polite-sugggestion-to-the-dubai-sovereign-that-creditors-of-dubai-world-not-be-bailed-out/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
