<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Catching up on Blog Comments</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2009/12/18/catching-up-on-blog-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/12/18/catching-up-on-blog-comments/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 06:47:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Josh Stern</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2009/12/18/catching-up-on-blog-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-23887</link> <dc:creator>Josh Stern</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:57:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2225#comment-23887</guid> <description>Hi David,
Look forward to your post on CEFs analysis.  The question on MLPs was linked by the following sort of thought -  In the case of funds, it is sometimes interesting to try and calculate a historical total return at NAV and compare that, if possible, to some appropriate benchmark of similar returns.   An MLP is a single company, so it clearly has a lot more variability and idiosyncratic issues.  But one way to think about both analyzing mgmt. effectiveness and assessing the extent to which  they are either over or under depreciating stated assets would be to try and build a similar historical profile of &quot;total intrinsic return&quot; made up of dividend plus tangible book value and compare that to a benchmark built out of other companies in the same industry.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p><p>Look forward to your post on CEFs analysis.  The question on MLPs was linked by the following sort of thought &#8211;  In the case of funds, it is sometimes interesting to try and calculate a historical total return at NAV and compare that, if possible, to some appropriate benchmark of similar returns.   An MLP is a single company, so it clearly has a lot more variability and idiosyncratic issues.  But one way to think about both analyzing mgmt. effectiveness and assessing the extent to which  they are either over or under depreciating stated assets would be to try and build a similar historical profile of &#8220;total intrinsic return&#8221; made up of dividend plus tangible book value and compare that to a benchmark built out of other companies in the same industry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
