<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What is Liquidity? (IV)</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2010/02/06/what-is-liquidity-iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2010/02/06/what-is-liquidity-iv/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 06:47:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Bob_in_MA</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2010/02/06/what-is-liquidity-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-24371</link> <dc:creator>Bob_in_MA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:31:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2332#comment-24371</guid> <description>Interesting post.
During 2007, the bull argument usually included the phrase, &quot;but there&#039;s so much liquidity!&quot; I heard someone say in response, &quot;yes, there&#039;s always a lot of liquidity, until there isn&#039;t.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.</p><p>During 2007, the bull argument usually included the phrase, &#8220;but there&#8217;s so much liquidity!&#8221; I heard someone say in response, &#8220;yes, there&#8217;s always a lot of liquidity, until there isn&#8217;t.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kid Dynamite</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2010/02/06/what-is-liquidity-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-24368</link> <dc:creator>Kid Dynamite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:40:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=2332#comment-24368</guid> <description>interesting, David - i&#039;d love to hear more rationale for your three bullet points at the end, because i think that the Fed and Treasury, by virtue of being new players (with new capital!) in an asset class, do indeed increase liquidity.  If there are no buyers of something, and now the Fed is a buyer by virtue of a policy change, doesn&#039;t that, by definition, increase liquidity?
Securitization, too, it seems, should definitely increase liquidity - at least in terms of ability to get exposure to an asset class.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting, David &#8211; i&#8217;d love to hear more rationale for your three bullet points at the end, because i think that the Fed and Treasury, by virtue of being new players (with new capital!) in an asset class, do indeed increase liquidity.  If there are no buyers of something, and now the Fed is a buyer by virtue of a policy change, doesn&#8217;t that, by definition, increase liquidity?</p><p>Securitization, too, it seems, should definitely increase liquidity &#8211; at least in terms of ability to get exposure to an asset class.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
