The Aleph Blog » Blog Archive » Creating a Stable Financial System, Part I

Creating a Stable Financial System, Part I

I’ve been thinking a lot about bank reform lately.  Here’s the core of the problem: deposits are sticky in ordinary times, particularly once you have a guarantor of deposits like the FDIC.  But for some banks, they look to other short term funding, whether it is short CDs or repo funding.

Now to me a lot of the issue is asset-liability mismatch.  Banks borrow short and lend long.  That leads to banking panics.  Financing illiquid assets with liquid liabilities is unstable, and begs for bankruptcy at the first significant loss of confidence.

But there is a greater mismatch present, which I want to explore.  Every asset is financed with some liability or equity.  And, every liability is someone else’s asset, but not vice-versa, because assets owned free and clear are equity-financed.

Assets financed by debt are frequently mismatched short.  Long mismatches are rare because of the cost of financing being too high.  Now, if short mismatches are small, that’s not a problem.  There is enough flexibility in financial balance sheets to accept small mismatches.  Real disasters happen when long assets are financed in such a way that there is a risk that the financing will fail prior to the assets being paid off.

The fundamental mismatch in debts that finance assets is that the ultimate assets being financed are longer-dated than the financing.  We fund land, houses, buildings, plant & equipment, and do it off of deposits, savings accounts and CDs.  Some financial companies finance off of short-dated repo funding.  The reason that this mismatch is hard to avoid is that average individuals who save want short-dated assets that can be used for transactions.  That doesn’t fit well against the need to fund long-term assets.

The same problem exists in the municipal bond market.  Much more money wants to invest short, while municipalities want to borrow long.  This leads to a steep muni yield curve.  Commercial insurers writing long tail business, and wealthy people that can tolerate interest rate volatility end up buying the long end, and lower taxes in the process.

If banks were required to approximately match cash flows for assets not financed by equity, yield curves would steepen for other areas of the fixed income markets.  Areas of the financial market where there are long/strong balance sheets, such as Life Insurers, Commerical Insurers, Defined Benefit Pensions and Endowments would get higher yields for longer commitments.  Banks would become a lower ROE business, and that would be good, as there would be many fewer failures, and there would be fewer banks; we are over-banked.  Time to re-educate bankers for more productive activities.

Long dated floating-rate loans could be a solution for banks funding loans  off of short-dated lending, or, using interest rate swaps to achieve the same result.  The risk is that a bank locks in what proves to be a low spread on the asset, while funding costs are volatile.

A few final notes: 1) the standard of broadly matching asset and liability cash flows should be applied to all regulated financial institutions, including investment banks.  Only surplus assets not needed to match liabilities can be used for investments with equity-like risk. 2) There must be an unpacking of complex vehicles with embedded leverage to do the Asset-Liability management.  As examples:

  • Securitizations
  • Repo Funding
  • Private Equity
  • Hedge Funds
  • Margin loans
  • SIVs and the like

would need to be reflected as looking through to the items ultimately financed.  As an example, the AAA portion of a senior-sub securitization is long the loans, and short the certificates sold to the rest of the deal.

Repo funding has its own issues.  In a crisis, haircuts rise as asset values fall.  Institutions relying on that funding often fail at those times, and leaves losses to the repo lender.  There would need to be something reflected for the risk of repo market failure, though the grand majority of the losses go to the borrower, and not the lender.

3) Even short lending to those getting loans that do not fully amortize should be reflected as loans that are longer-dated, because of the risk of rates being higher, and refinancing is not possible.

I have more to say, but I’m going to hit the publish now.  Comments are welcome.






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Accounting, Banks, Bonds, Insurance, Portfolio Management, public policy, Real Estate and Mortgages, Structured Products and Derivatives | RSS 2.0 |

7 Responses to Creating a Stable Financial System, Part I

  1. [...] The inherent problem with the financial system is an asset-liability mismatch.  (Aleph Blog) [...]

  2. [...] Creating a Stable Financial System, Part I [...]

  3. matt says:

    This is politically impossible. You are basically talking about a system with less leverage (which, by definition, is more stable). It is politically impossible because:

    1. Short term dislocation in credit markets that would result
    2. Politicians are already fighting deleveraging
    3. Less leverage means less tax advantage (equity financed income is taxed higher, effectively)
    4. Mostly, it is impossible because of the influence the finance sector has over the broader business community. American business are broadly dependent on (what I call) the international banking cartel. This cartel doesn’t want to deleverage and it is a near certainty that they will squeeze businesses to apply pressure on politicians in order to maintain their financial paradigm.

    Since we are talking about politically impossible ideas, why not just enact a simpler one (i.e., one that requires less people to enforce than regulation): let companies fail. When they get the hint that they can fail, they will naturally move to tighter risk controls that will likely resemble some kind of immunization or cash flow matching strategy.

  4. Your ideas have good intentions, but as the other comment said, it is politically impossible. The current banking system subsidizes loans to business by not charging a high enough FDIC fee to cover the true cost of insuring banks.

  5. [...] Solving banks, matching assets and [...]

  6. [...] important, because that is what drives our credit booms and busts.  If banks did not engage in maturity transformation, borrowing short and lending long, we would have almost no banking crises.  Crises happen because there is a run on liquidity.  [...]

  7. [...] important, because that is what drives our credit booms and busts.  If banks did not engage in maturity transformation, borrowing short and lending long, we would have almost no banking crises.  Crises happen because there is a run on liquidity.  [...]

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin