The Aleph Blog » Blog Archive » Notes on the 2011 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report, Part 1

Notes on the 2011 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report, Part 1

Start with the basics, this is on the Annual Report, not just the shareholder letter.  I may have a second report out after the 10K is released.

1) One thing that was fascinating was the large number of low level acquisitions happening in the subsidiaries, and the desire for more of them.  There is interest at Lubrizol, McLane, TTI, CTB, Marmon, etc.

2) With BRK and IBM, Buffett hopes that public buyers and sellers will be stupid, and sell their shares at levels far below what the eventual prices will be, allowing the remaining shareholders to do better, as management buys in shares at a bargain, benefiting the persisting shareholders.

3) Buffett makes it clear, though that no matter how much cash has has, if prices are dropping rapidly, he won’t put a floor under the stock.  He’ll let the stock fall, and buy bit-by-bit through the whole process.  Indeed, it might be to his advantage to let the price fall below the 110% of Book level for a time to unnerve those that may be gaming the situation.

4) BRK does not talk its book as a result.  They would rather have the stock cheap for buybacks.  (Eeenh… but wouldn’t they rather have the stock higher to aid acquisitions?)

5) And if they firmly know what the value will be in the long run, they would love it if other investors would be scaredy cats and sell out to management at cheap levels so that they could have more of the value as they do not sell.  (Buffett does not phrase it that way, but this is a zero-sum game as far as trading goes.)

6) Buffett talked a lot about goodwill this year, much more than in prior years.  Goodwill makes up about 30% of BRKs book value.  I appreciated his argument regarding goodwill at the insurance companies — if your underwriting profits over nine years exceed goodwill the goodwill is most secure.

7) That said, partly due to lower interest rates, underwriting profitability has been higher for the P&C industry as a whole.  BRK may be better in aggregate, but some of Buffett’s industry comments are not warranted.  BRK is better in degree, not kind.

8 ) Buffett has the key of good P&C underwriting/management when he says “be willing to walk away if the appropriate premium can’t be obtained.”  That’s the only way to do it, with the price that your company will shrink when the rest of the industry is nuts.

9) All that said, the insurance lines did not do well this year, particularly not BH Reinsurance Group, which is Ajit Jain’s baby.  Part of that was the large catastrophes this year, some of it seems to come from not knowing how to run a life reinsurer.

10) Retroactive reinsurance showed gains, because losses on Swiss Re’s P&C experience was better than expected.  However, that was wiped out by Swiss Re Life & Health America’s business doing much worse than expected.

In one sense, a big question for BRK is whether they will spend the money to get the expertise necessary to run a big life reinsurer profitably.  So far, the answer seems to be no.  In my opinion, they need to hire experts, or buy out RGA.  Why buy the line from Sun Life when you could have RGA?

11) On principle 11 — BRK distinguishes itself among private equity buyers by leaving distinctive corporate cultures in place , and not interfering with them.  That may not help the present, but it helps the future, as wealthy people selling out take less, because they know their friends in the business will be left intact.

That won’t attract all sellers, but it will attract some.

And note that BRK will cut their losses on hopeless subsidiaries, or those beset by labor woes.

12) As usual, BRK’s reserve development is good, with releases coming from prior years.

More in the next part on Monday.

Full disclosure: long RGA






Tags:

bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Accounting, Bonds, Insurance, Portfolio Management, Stocks, Value Investing | RSS 2.0 |

6 Responses to Notes on the 2011 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report, Part 1

  1. Conscience of a Conservative says:

    Two things caught my eye in the Berkshire report. First he’s giving up on derivatives due to posting of collateral requirements. He seems to be arguing for the discredited AIG system where margin is not posted or adjusted. Second his investment in agriculture which really comes off as one of his better investments when you consider money put in and dividends paid out.

    • GarageHFManager says:

      On Point 4, I think he’s loathe to use equity as consideration for acquisition for a number of reasons. Though I agree with you that if it is expensive that its better consideration than cash.

  2. [...] tidbits from the Berkshire letter.  (Aleph Blog, Kid Dynamite, Geoff [...]

  3. Greg says:

    Seems like BRK has much higher succession risk than most.

    Whoever the mystery successor is, it probably won’t be the son of a congress member like Buffet. Even if BRK finds such a person, Buffet himself is now having trouble collecting on cronyism. He has to kiss up to Obama at least as much as GE’s Immelt or JPM’s Dimon.

    Buffet likes the old AIG system (which he *thought* he was buying into with GenRe) because it is a lot easier to conceal crony handouts under such a system.

  4. [...] tidbits from the Berkshire letter.  (Aleph Blog, Kid Dynamite, Geoff [...]

  5. [...] Notes On The 2011 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report, Part 1 (Aleph Blog) [...]

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin