The Aleph Blog » Blog Archive » Bombing Baby BDC Bonds

Bombing Baby BDC Bonds

After reading Jason Zweig’s good piece, “Should You Bottle Up Your Money in ‘Baby Bonds’?” I said to myself, “But what does the prospectus look like?”  So I went to EDGAR, and pulled up the prospectus for Fifth Street Finance Corp’s 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024.

Please understand — I get squeamish with the unsecured bonds of exotic financial companies.  Losses on the bonds of financial companies when they fail tend to be far worse than those of industrials or utilities.  That is a major reason why financial bonds typically yield more than similarly rated non-financial bonds.  They are more risky.

So, looking through the deal summary terms, we learn:

  • At $75 million, the deal is small.
  • It’s a 12-year deal — that’s done to confuse buyers, because it gets priced off the 10-year Treasury, giving the illusion of more spread.
  • Quarterly pay of interest which raises the effective yield a touch.
  • Senior subordinated, but…
  • effectively subordinated to all our existing and future secured indebtedness (including indebtedness that is initially unsecured to which we subsequently grant security), to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, including without limitation, the $206.3 million of borrowings under our credit facilities outstanding as of October 10, 2012; and
  • structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of any of our subsidiaries, including without limitation, the indebtedness of Fifth Street Funding, LLC, Fifth Street Funding II, LLC and our SBIC subsidiaries.
  • The bonds are callable at par after 5 years.

The structural protections here are weak.  You are lending to a financial holding company where many of the assets are pledged to other creditors.  More on that in a moment.

The risk factors for a business development company like Fifth Street are significant, and can be found here, all eighteen-plus pages of them.  But the risk factors of the debt are more significant, and can be found here.  Here are the main headings:

  • The Notes will be unsecured and therefore will be effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness we have currently incurred or may incur in the future.
  • The Notes will be structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.
  • The indenture under which the Notes will be issued will contain limited protection for holders of the Notes.
  • There is no existing trading market for the Notes and, even if the NYSE approves the listing of the Notes, an active trading market for the Notes may not develop, which could limit your ability to sell the Notes or the market price of the Notes. 
  • If we default on our obligations to pay our other indebtedness, we may not be able to make payments on the Notes.

Unsecured holding company debt can be weak, because with some subsidiaries there may be regulatory limits or private limits to upstreaming capital to the holding companies.  That puts financial holding companies in a weak position, because when financial conditions get bad liquidity can get very tight.

And with business development companies [BDCs], which own and finance small-to-medium sized businesses, there is a lot of idiosyncratic risk including:

  • Your downside is 100%, but your upside is capped.
  • BDCs tend to be speculative investors.
  • Many of the assets held are subject to third-party security interests, which lessens the rights of unsecured lenders to the holding company.
  • BDCs, life REITs, have to pay out 90%+ of taxable income in order not to face corporate taxation.  That forces BDCs to continually go to the credit markets for financing.  But what if the market is no longer favorable for a year or two?
  • BDCs are placid weather vehicles, and more so the bonds.  One might be better off holding 30% Treasuries and 70% BDC stock.  At least you have more downside protection, and more upside.

So put me in the camp of those that have no interest in BDC debt.  It is a weak instrument, and regardless of what the rating agencies say, they are not investment grade risks.

Bonds, Portfolio Management, Speculation | RSS 2.0 |

2 Responses to Bombing Baby BDC Bonds

  1. Conscience of a Conservative says:

    I believe it’s a rule of finance(or it ought to be) that when companies go to the small guy for money it’s because the funding is cheaper(or in other words the little guy hasn’t figured something out). Hard to see how Fifth Street Finance Corp makes a good case that they will be around and solvent in 2024 when the investors expect to get their principal back. There’s no clarity with regards to a future income stream.
    There’s also the risk of insolvency without warning as the company plans to track its investments using fair value and not market value. The companies been borrowing at libor +(2.75-3.0) or in other words high risk which ironically appears to be secured unlike what you’ll be buying.

  2. [...] Investors are getting lured by ‘baby bonds.’  (Jason Zweig also Aleph Blog) [...]


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.

Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.

Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin