<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: On Human Fertility, Part 2</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:20:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Investment Reading and Finance Links &#8211; December 7, 2012</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30849</link> <dc:creator>Investment Reading and Finance Links &#8211; December 7, 2012</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:42:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30849</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] On Human Fertility, Part 2 (The Aleph Blog) [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Human Fertility, Part 2 (The Aleph Blog) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Counterparties: No one likes Leveson &#124; Latest News</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30799</link> <dc:creator>Counterparties: No one likes Leveson &#124; Latest News</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 13:43:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30799</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] A look at national fertility rates suggests the world&#8217;s population will peak in 2030 &#8211; Aleph Blog Americans making a record low amount of Americans &#8211; Pew Social [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A look at national fertility rates suggests the world&#8217;s population will peak in 2030 &#8211; Aleph Blog Americans making a record low amount of Americans &#8211; Pew Social [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ReneeA</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30783</link> <dc:creator>ReneeA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:07:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30783</guid> <description><![CDATA[Do children really contribute to their parents financially though?
Too many older parents are paying for college, when they should be preparing for retirement.  If the student has the loans, how can the child financially help the parents when she or he has college debt, a mortgage/rent, and wanting to start a family of their own.
Parents are helping children out well into adulthood financially, helping with college or a down payment on a house.
Children never seem to pay in the financial sense, older adult children are there to ensure parents are cared for though. Being able to drive them to doctor&#039;s appointments or obtaining proper elder care when they can no longer live independently in their homes.   The mere checking in once a day, if you indeed still have a relationship with your adult child/children.
As someone with four children, as an educated American, I never felt at ease how much government influence the push for a smaller family. We&#039;re are constantly marketed that women have choices, but really there are larger goal to push women to have &#039;no more then two&#039;. This comes from economic influences, such as buying a home based on two incomes rather then one. A mortgage based on both incomes forces a woman to work full-time. Then add day-care, after having two children, a woman&#039;s paycheck goes completely to cover day-care and the house.  Student debt, doesn&#039;t help in the equation, financially forcing women (and men) to post-pone children.
I don&#039;t think our government really wants  housing or education to be truly affordable, the inflated costs of these two things artificially creates an environment in which it makes sense to have one possible two children at most.  Also culturally we shame young moms, I know several young mothers through out the years. Otherwise in a healthy relationship with the father eventually marrying and supportive extended family, the finished school/trade and are doing fine. They&#039;re not in extreme poverty.
Sure we don&#039;t live in the suburbs, but the lights are on and there is good on the table. I like to think it pays off, the fewer material items and lower transportation costs reduces our carbon footprint.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do children really contribute to their parents financially though?</p><p>Too many older parents are paying for college, when they should be preparing for retirement.  If the student has the loans, how can the child financially help the parents when she or he has college debt, a mortgage/rent, and wanting to start a family of their own.</p><p>Parents are helping children out well into adulthood financially, helping with college or a down payment on a house.</p><p>Children never seem to pay in the financial sense, older adult children are there to ensure parents are cared for though. Being able to drive them to doctor&#8217;s appointments or obtaining proper elder care when they can no longer live independently in their homes.   The mere checking in once a day, if you indeed still have a relationship with your adult child/children.</p><p>As someone with four children, as an educated American, I never felt at ease how much government influence the push for a smaller family. We&#8217;re are constantly marketed that women have choices, but really there are larger goal to push women to have &#8216;no more then two&#8217;. This comes from economic influences, such as buying a home based on two incomes rather then one. A mortgage based on both incomes forces a woman to work full-time. Then add day-care, after having two children, a woman&#8217;s paycheck goes completely to cover day-care and the house.  Student debt, doesn&#8217;t help in the equation, financially forcing women (and men) to post-pone children.</p><p>I don&#8217;t think our government really wants  housing or education to be truly affordable, the inflated costs of these two things artificially creates an environment in which it makes sense to have one possible two children at most.  Also culturally we shame young moms, I know several young mothers through out the years. Otherwise in a healthy relationship with the father eventually marrying and supportive extended family, the finished school/trade and are doing fine. They&#8217;re not in extreme poverty.</p><p>Sure we don&#8217;t live in the suburbs, but the lights are on and there is good on the table. I like to think it pays off, the fewer material items and lower transportation costs reduces our carbon footprint.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cig</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30782</link> <dc:creator>cig</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:22:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30782</guid> <description><![CDATA[What I was saying is that &quot;more kids as insurance&quot; likely only works at the very poor end. In middle-income plus countries, it becomes quality OR quantity for people without star teacher spouses and outlier level of resources, that is more kids may provide less insurance than a manageable number for them.
While socialised retirement is surely a disincentive, and we know you like to blame governments for every ill in the world as a matter of faith, I suspect the coefficient is quite low. The phenomenon of people having fewer kids as countries become wealthier is universal, and surely some of those countries have very little in terms of socialised old age provisions.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I was saying is that &#8220;more kids as insurance&#8221; likely only works at the very poor end. In middle-income plus countries, it becomes quality OR quantity for people without star teacher spouses and outlier level of resources, that is more kids may provide less insurance than a manageable number for them.</p><p>While socialised retirement is surely a disincentive, and we know you like to blame governments for every ill in the world as a matter of faith, I suspect the coefficient is quite low. The phenomenon of people having fewer kids as countries become wealthier is universal, and surely some of those countries have very little in terms of socialised old age provisions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Human Population To Peak In 2030? &#171; Tim Zimmermann</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30777</link> <dc:creator>Human Population To Peak In 2030? &#171; Tim Zimmermann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30777</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] of peaking at up to 10.5 billion in 2050, this analyst, based on declining fertility rates, thinks human population could peak sooner and lower: I write about this every now and then, because human fertility is falling faster then most [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of peaking at up to 10.5 billion in 2050, this analyst, based on declining fertility rates, thinks human population could peak sooner and lower: I write about this every now and then, because human fertility is falling faster then most [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30776</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:36:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30776</guid> <description><![CDATA[How do you get goods into the future for your old age when there is no means of saving, and property rights are not well protected?  Kids.  How you get more productive children? Educate them.  What if there are no schools, and death rates are high?  Have a few more kids as insurance.
As it is, the West is going into demographic eclipse, where we will find that our entitlement systems don&#039;t work well with stagnant or shrinking populations.  Collectivizing old age care removes an incentive to have children, which leads to underfunded, broken entitlement systems.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you get goods into the future for your old age when there is no means of saving, and property rights are not well protected?  Kids.  How you get more productive children? Educate them.  What if there are no schools, and death rates are high?  Have a few more kids as insurance.</p><p>As it is, the West is going into demographic eclipse, where we will find that our entitlement systems don&#8217;t work well with stagnant or shrinking populations.  Collectivizing old age care removes an incentive to have children, which leads to underfunded, broken entitlement systems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A look at national fertility rates suggests the world&#8217;s population will peak in 2030 &#124; Screw Cable</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30774</link> <dc:creator>A look at national fertility rates suggests the world&#8217;s population will peak in 2030 &#124; Screw Cable</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:24:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30774</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] alephblog.com &#8211; Tagged: Replication View on Counterparties.com &#8594;   Amazon.com Widgets    var [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] alephblog.com &#8211; Tagged: Replication View on Counterparties.com &rarr;   Amazon.com Widgets    var [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Counterparties: No one likes Leveson &#124; Felix Salmon</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30773</link> <dc:creator>Counterparties: No one likes Leveson &#124; Felix Salmon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:01:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30773</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] A look at national fertility rates suggests the world&#8217;s population will peak in 2030 &#8211; Aleph Blog Americans making a record low amount of Americans &#8211; Pew Social [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A look at national fertility rates suggests the world&#8217;s population will peak in 2030 &#8211; Aleph Blog Americans making a record low amount of Americans &#8211; Pew Social [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cig</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30771</link> <dc:creator>cig</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:40:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30771</guid> <description><![CDATA[Even if we assume people are having kids for the sole purpose of providing for their old age (and I hope they aren&#039;t), is maximising the headcount the optimal strategy? In a developed society, having successful kids who will have spare cash to support the parents may be better than having too many who can be barely fed and educated, and who will end up at the bottom of the pile, short of both time and money to support their elderly parents (notwithstanding the ability of some outliers to do quality and quantity).]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if we assume people are having kids for the sole purpose of providing for their old age (and I hope they aren&#8217;t), is maximising the headcount the optimal strategy? In a developed society, having successful kids who will have spare cash to support the parents may be better than having too many who can be barely fed and educated, and who will end up at the bottom of the pile, short of both time and money to support their elderly parents (notwithstanding the ability of some outliers to do quality and quantity).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thursday links: no easy answers - Abnormal Returns &#124; Abnormal Returns</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/11/29/on-human-fertility-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30768</link> <dc:creator>Thursday links: no easy answers - Abnormal Returns &#124; Abnormal Returns</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:48:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5572#comment-30768</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] The globe&#8217;s birth rate is slowing faster than previously projected.  (Aleph Blog) [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The globe&#8217;s birth rate is slowing faster than previously projected.  (Aleph Blog) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>