The Aleph Blog » Blog Archive » Investing In P&C Insurers

Investing In P&C Insurers

When I was half my current age, an actuary in my life insurance firm said to me, “Property-Casualty insurance is not real insurance.  When they lose money, they just raise rates, and they make the money back.”  Today, with greater knowledge, I know that he was half-right.  Here is where he was wrong:

  1. If a P&C insurer risks a significant fraction of its surplus, such that if they could lose enough in a single year that they would not be able to write more business, that is an insurer to avoid.  Good P&C insurers do not bet the farm.  They manage such that they will always stay in the game, allowing themselves to write good business at good rates after a disaster.
  2. If a few badly-run insurers die after a disaster, that is all the better for those that remain.  Capacity exits, and those left standing raise rates and earn strong profits.  P&C insurers and reinsurers that “swing for the fences” tend to die.
  3. As with most things in life, it is those that take moderate risks that do best.  Invest in those P&C insurers.
  4. P&C insurance is insurance on a micro level.  It is not as if losses are directly rated back to insureds.  On a macro level, conservative P&C insurers and reinsurers are toll-takers.
  5. This applies more closely to short-tail and mid-tail insurers.  Long-tail insurers take a long time to validate their underwriting, and in certain environments, can go broke more easily than other P&C insurers.

That said, P&C insurers and reinsurers that underwrite and invest carefully tend to make money regularly, and with a better return on equity than most industries.  It is one big reason why Warren Buffett has done so well over the years.  Small underwriting gains combined with small investing gains can compound quite well, leading to a very nice overall return.

There is one more advantage here.  Insurance fuses the twin problems of uncertainty and time [accruals].  This is difficult enough, but the accounting treatment discourages many from analyzing the insurers.  Complexity in business begets accounting complexity.

That is why I think that my main job with insurers is analyzing the management team. Good management teams think like owners, and reduce exposure when times are aggressive.

That’s why 15% of my portfolios for clients & me are in P&C insurers.  They have done well in the past, and there are no changes indicating why they won’t do well in the long run if they are conservative.

 






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Insurance, Stocks, Value Investing | RSS 2.0 |

3 Responses to Investing In P&C Insurers

  1. taw says:

    Couldn’t agree more…the larger P&C companies have predictable results, most pay a dividend and have experienced mgmt. There are many smaller companies which are investable only if you are willing to do your own research. I also find that there are many good preferred stocks among the P&C companies which are excellent for fixed income, e.g. ENH, AXS, AHL, MHLD, MRH all have preferred paying 7% or so.

  2. evan_ng says:

    Hi David, thanks for your view points. I think most readers are like me who would be interested to know more on how to analyze the insurance industry. Could you give us some recommended readings? Thanks.

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin